Memory is cheap, can always buy portable storage :devil:fatjp said:Agree, i shoot in RAW almost 90% unless really no more memory.
Actually, would it be better to shoot in RAW only, if really need to process in JPEG, then use Nikon Capture Editor to batch convert to JPEG, my estimate is about 5-10sec for each JPEG conversion.Andy Ho said:I think shooting in RAW is not only about memory usage. It is about whether you have the time to do post processing. Many photographers forgot the fact that it takes a lot longer to process a RAW file than Jpeg files. Although I shoot RAW most of the time, I still switch back to Jpeg whenever I know that there is going to be a lot of pictures at the end of the day, for example an event or conference shoots.
If you are not confident in shooting Jpeg only then another alternative is to set your camera to shoot both RAW and Jpegs simultaneously. If the Jpeg is ok then trash the RAW. If not, you still have something to fall back on.
That is what I do but like me, if you are using D2X, you would probably be cursing and swearing if you have like 300 files in a day on NEF to convert to JpegsAstin said:Actually, would it be better to shoot in RAW only, if really need to process in JPEG, then use Nikon Capture Editor to batch convert to JPEG, my estimate is about 5-10sec for each JPEG conversion.
And why would you want to shoot in B&W jpegs? :dunno:speedblade said:or with the 20D, black and white JPEG and "colour" RAW together.
Been there, done that, have tried 700 files in a day. I'm still aliveAndy Ho said:That is what I do but like me, if you are using D2X, you would probably be cursing and swearing if you have like 300 files in a day on NEF to convert to Jpegs
Hey you can do that? I mean I am not good with computers although I can use them well but I dare not do any other things when doing batch processing fearing that it will cause my system to crash or interrupt the conversion process. Should try. Thanks for the pointers :thumbsup:madmacs said:i almost always shoot raw. processing hundreds of files? time-consuming yes but the key to minimizing this is automation. 300 files probably takes my mac a couple of hours to batch process and convert to jpg. and i can still surf and email while this goes on.
Andy Ho said:Hey you can do that? I mean I am not good with computers although I can use them well but I dare not do any other things when doing batch processing fearing that it will cause my system to crash or interrupt the conversion process. Should try. Thanks for the pointers :thumbsup:
ortega said:I only use raw for landscapes, everything else is jpeg.
automation + raw = lppl