how many lens do i need?


Status
Not open for further replies.

wtm78

New Member
Feb 7, 2009
124
0
0
#1
how many lens do i need to cover most events?

i got a 18-55, 75-300, 18-200, and a 50mm.. what else am i lacking?
 

#3
how many lens do i need to cover most events?

i got a 18-55, 75-300, 18-200, and a 50mm.. what else am i lacking?
You have a wide angle lens with 2 telephoto lens. You are not lacking any distance coverage, but you are lacking in good quality, good bokeh lens F/2.8 or higher.
 

Jul 27, 2008
472
0
0
Singapore
www.flickr.com
#4
1) Macro 60mm/100mm
2) Tilt "n" Shift 24mm
3) 400mm F5.6
4) 300mm F2.8
5) 500mm
6) 600mm
7) Flashes and many more~

As you can see, you are most probably going to end up collecting lenses.... whatever you have now is good enough for daily picture taking. Whats important is that do you find the current setup you have inferior in anyway? If you do, then buy lenses that overcome these issues you have with them. However, I would suggest a flash unit possible a 430EXII or 580EXII to your current setup. The word you used is "event" and that many of you lenses do not work well in low light conditions. a flash unit would take you many notches higher. Do consider that upgrade.

Cheers~
 

giantcanopy

Senior Member
Feb 11, 2007
6,232
2
0
SG
#6
how many lens do i need to cover most events?

i got a 18-55, 75-300, 18-200, and a 50mm.. what else am i lacking?
Then u must ask what else u think is lacking when u shoot :D

Ryan
 

ortega

Moderator
Staff member
Nov 2, 2004
23,694
10
38
Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
#7
how many lens do i need to cover most events?

i got a 18-55, 75-300, 18-200, and a 50mm.. what else am i lacking?
you are missing a ultra wide angle, super telephoto, macro, tilt shift and fish eye

but for events, normally 1 or 2 lens is enough
i guess you are shooting DX format

fast zooms is the most versatile for events
 

Last edited:

jaRv1s

New Member
Jun 5, 2009
611
0
0
Singapore
#9
no matter how many lenses you own, you would always feel that you're lack of one lens... that's how the collection add up... ;)
 

Reim1o

New Member
Jun 14, 2008
180
0
0
Melbourne, Australia
redbubble.com
#10
Usually 3 lenses is all you need. My recommended list for beginners using cropped sensor would be:

Wide Angle: 10-22 or 11-16
Portrait and Low light: 50mm 1.8 or 1.4
Tele: 70-200 f/4 or 55-250

I'm using 4 myself on full frame body:

Wide: 16-35
Primes: 50 1.4, 90 2.8 TSE, 135 2.0

Ditched tele zoom as I almost never use it
 

ZerocoolAstra

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2008
9,522
0
0
rainy Singapore
#11
how many lens do i need to cover most events?

i got a 18-55, 75-300, 18-200, and a 50mm.. what else am i lacking?
let's see:


1) 10.5 DX fisheye
2) 10-24 f/3.5-4.5 DX
3) 17-55 f/2.8 DX
4) AFS 35 f/1.8 DX
5) AFS 50 f/1.4
6) AFS 60 f/2.8 micro
7) 70-200 f/2.8 VR
8) 400 f/2.8

there... should be all right with those :devil::devil:

you didn't say what event mah... I presume "covering the World Cup Finals" qualifies as an event too ;)
 

Jul 27, 2008
472
0
0
Singapore
www.flickr.com
#12
let's see:


1) 10.5 DX fisheye
2) 10-24 f/3.5-4.5 DX
3) 17-55 f/2.8 DX
4) AFS 35 f/1.8 DX
5) AFS 50 f/1.4
6) AFS 60 f/2.8 micro
7) 70-200 f/2.8 VR
8) 400 f/2.8

there... should be all right with those :devil::devil:

you didn't say what event mah... I presume "covering the World Cup Finals" qualifies as an event too ;)
Haha play punk sial~ your picks are Deadly!:devil:
 

#13
I'm using a full frame camera, but I find that 16-35, 24-70, and 70-200 gives me all the range i need. If you're shooting sports or wildlife, you'll need something longer than 200 (or an extender if you like live with the image quality degradation and light loss).

I don't feel a need for primes. f/2.8 is fast enough for me in all situations, and the zooms are adequately sharp. I have a cheap-o 50mm f/1.8 just to play around with, but very rarely use it outside the house.

Eric
 

Reportage

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2008
5,785
2
0
#14
how many lens do i need to cover most events?

i got a 18-55, 75-300, 18-200, and a 50mm.. what else am i lacking?
actually what you have are enough if you have a decent flash. Its only when no flash is allowed you might want to consider something like the tamron 17-50 f2.8 + sigma 70-200 f2.8 if on a budget.
 

Jul 27, 2008
472
0
0
Singapore
www.flickr.com
#16
actually what you have are enough if you have a decent flash. Its only when no flash is allowed you might want to consider something like the tamron 17-50 f2.8 + sigma 70-200 f2.8 if on a budget.
I concur with the above statement. sharpness and all the other jargons are one thing. current setup with a flash is good enough for most situations.:thumbsup:
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom