How best to shoot with heavy lens - hand-held vs tripod


arphaxad12

New Member
Oct 25, 2009
103
0
0
West coast
#1
Hi,
Not sure this is right place to pose my question. The question sounded so basic hence I decided to post it here. Planned to rent a 200-400mm lens to take pictures of the fighter planes flypast this National Day. However the weight would be a problem if hand-held, shaky hands. However if mounted on tripod, may have problem even looking for the planes thru view finder. Any advice from those who had tried this kind of situation before? thanks!
 

Fudgecakes

New Member
Oct 1, 2011
1,799
0
0
Planet Earth
#2
arphaxad12 said:
Hi,
Not sure this is right place to pose my question. The question sounded so basic hence I decided to post it here. Planned to rent a 200-400mm lens to take pictures of the fighter planes flypast this National Day. However the weight would be a problem if hand-held, shaky hands. However if mounted on tripod, may have problem even looking for the planes thru view finder. Any advice from those who had tried this kind of situation before? thanks!
Monopod. Haha. I would recommend the manfrotto 680b because I am selling one :p but seriously, a monopod is your best bet. Preferably with a ball head to let you adjust the angle of the lens ;)
 

WBalance

New Member
Jul 2, 2009
27
0
0
#3
I have seen some monopod that can stand on its own via 3 additional legs, so it's more stable than a monopod.
 

Fudgecakes

New Member
Oct 1, 2011
1,799
0
0
Planet Earth
#4
WBalance said:
I have seen some monopod that can stand on its own via 3 additional legs, so it's more stable than a monopod.
So it's a..... Mono-tripod? Haha! From benphoto or fotopro right?
 

Dec 12, 2009
1,961
2
0
#5
How does monopod helps you look through viewfinder better than a tripod or even hand held? Usually you have you anticipate where the planes will come from and to pin point their location you have to switch between your eye and viewfinder.

Also at supertele range any movement of your lens is going to be amplified through the viewfinder that's you need more stability.

Monopods are harder to use than tripod as you need a little techinques in your posture to achieve stability. Just that a monopod is more portable to move around and take up less space.

Where are you going to shoot the planes from?
 

Last edited:

arphaxad12

New Member
Oct 25, 2009
103
0
0
West coast
#6
Has 2 tickets to the yellow sector (highest tier) infront of the floating platform. Best would be to bring the tripod along, not sure they allow camera bag and tripod. Hence I thought of the monopod also. For fireworks I will surely require the tripod.
 

Dec 12, 2009
1,961
2
0
#7
Hopefully there is space for such a huge lens, not sure if there's ample space around you without hitting anyone... let alone a tripod.

Actually if you have a camera with good high iso performance... sigma 150-500 is my choice. Smaller can be handheld... just smaller aperture.
 

Uncle Meng

New Member
Jul 23, 2012
73
0
0
Hougang
#8
I am not sure whether monopod or tripod is easier cos it varies with individuals. But one thing I know for sure is shooting fighter planes in the sky with a 200-400mm lens hand-held is almost impossible.... unless you are very strong. :)
 

Shizuma

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2012
2,557
25
0
#9
every day do 12 sets of 20 repetitions of panning the sky with the lens attached. if not lens, use a 1.5L bottle (full of water, or better still, cement)
 

fmeeran

New Member
Nov 5, 2010
834
0
0
Clementi, Singapore
#10
gundamseed84 said:
Actually if you have a camera with good high iso performance... sigma 150-500 is my choice. Smaller can be handheld... just smaller aperture.
I would suggest the same. I have some good photographs of fighters with the 150-500mm somewhere. Plus you don't need the subject isolation for the jets in the sky. :)
 

rhino123

Moderator
Staff member
Sep 1, 2006
5,243
15
38
NA
#11
Actually... it depends on your shutter speed. If your speed is fast enough (say around 1/400mm) then it might be able to compensate for some shakes. I use a 300mm + 1.4x TC before, and shoot at around 1/300 to 1/400sec and my pics turned out clear and sharp... even at moving objects.
 

Top Bottom