Help Please! Nikon 80-200 or Sigma 50-500???


Status
Not open for further replies.

koolkef

New Member
Nov 8, 2004
200
0
0
45
in the north, Yishun
#1
Hi all,

I am thinking of getting a zoom lens for myself.

Originally thought of the Nikon 80-200 2.8 af d but now starting to consider the sigma 50-500.

Your views and suggestions will be much appreciated. :bsmilie:

Thank you. ;)

Kevin.
 

koolkef

New Member
Nov 8, 2004
200
0
0
45
in the north, Yishun
#3
meepokman said:
My personal opinion:

Don't waste time, money & effort

Get the AFS 80-200 f2.8
HI there meepokman,

BUt the AFS is around $2700 range right? So much money!!!
Wife will hang me first, anyway she is buying the lens for me. :D

What about the 2 touch version, just the AFD??

Thanks. ;)

Kef.
 

plinius

New Member
May 22, 2003
669
0
0
44
Singapore
Visit site
#4
both lenses cover very different ranges leh.. what u intent to shoot?

big mama shld be more for wildlife, birds etc etc..........

koolkef said:
HI there meepokman,

BUt the AFS is around $2700 range right? So much money!!!
Wife will hang me first, anyway she is buying the lens for me. :D

What about the 2 touch version, just the AFD??

Thanks. ;)

Kef.
 

Kho King

Senior Member
Jan 20, 2002
2,513
0
0
41
shashinki.com
#5
I will choose the 80-200mm anyday. Get the AFD version at S$1650 or lower.
 

koolkef

New Member
Nov 8, 2004
200
0
0
45
in the north, Yishun
#6
That was what my wife said "Get the Nikon!" and also "Why all your hobbies so expensive!". :dunno: like archery and RC flying and boating....

OK :thumbsup: , now one last question?

Where is the best place to get this lens???

Thank u. THank u. Thank u.


Kevin. :angel:
 

2100

Senior Member
Mar 3, 2004
3,591
0
0
48
#9
Both lenses are for totally different uses. I have both, sort of. Guess you need to tell us what do you intend to go for. Else comments won't be useful at all.
 

stout

New Member
Oct 6, 2004
197
0
0
#10
I have both too, agrees with 2100 that both has it own good points.

bought 80/70-200mm first, v good lens but abit short!

than buoght 50-500 good with TC 1.4 though need good light!

Me will keep both, cause both has its own uses!
 

user111

Senior Member
Jul 27, 2004
4,702
0
36
#11
advise: buy a used 80-200 for speed (2.8) plus a cheap 3rd party 400/5.6 for the occasional longer reach.
 

koolkef

New Member
Nov 8, 2004
200
0
0
45
in the north, Yishun
#12
I am already using a Tokina ATX 80-200 f2.8 (not pro version).

Thought of getting the nikon for the contrast and the sharpness.

Would also like the added zoom of the sigma. Thought the nikon will be good in portraits but shooting wildlife up close will be fun too.

Torn in the middle?

Cheers!

Kevin.
 

smallaperture

Senior Member
Jan 5, 2004
2,441
0
0
Catchment Area
#13
Can also consider the Sigma 100-300 F4. In terms of optical quality, this one is on par with the 80-200 and also, relatively fast at F4. And pretty affordable at 1500 or thereabout.

Also, this is a constant length zoom, so that air is not exchanged with the outside as you zoom and focus. As a result, your lens and your sensor would remain clean for a long time to come, if you like to think long term. By long term, I mean a year or two.

With some dust in a 20 element lens like the 50-500, it's gonna to have lots of flare and become very, very soft. BTW, in the first place, it's already soft in the long end brand new as a 10x zoom.

Just to share what I have learnt.
 

glennyong

Senior Member
May 2, 2004
5,587
0
0
Singapore
#14
eerm.. if u gt the $, den u get the Nikon AFS la... hahaha.. dun think of the Sigma since u can get the Nikon
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom