Linear means line, Circular obviously in circular.
LP (Linear Polariser) CP (Circular Polariser)
LP requires you to rotate the filter to a point where the light entering the lens is polarised. B'cos the polarising elements are in straight lines across the filter.
CP does not need any of this adjustment, simply plug and play.
I suggest you don't save the cost and go straight to CP as you want to spent more time taking the pics than adjusting the equipment.
donchua said:What are the differences between Circular & Linear Polarizers?
For Canon A95 with adapter tube, should I get the Circular or Linear type?
Seem that Linear Polarizer is more cheaper.
Thanks.
tommon said:Linear means line, Circular obviously in circular.
LP (Linear Polariser) CP (Circular Polariser)
LP requires you to rotate the filter to a point where the light entering the lens is polarised. B'cos the polarising elements are in straight lines across the filter.
CP does not need any of this adjustment, simply plug and play.
I suggest you don't save the cost and go straight to CP as you want to spent more time taking the pics than adjusting the equipment.
rain_danz said:never had much experience with PL filters as I shoot saturated slides (Velvia, EVS, etc) anyway...
gneseew said:I bought a vitacon circular polarizer.. but i figured out I can't achieve the effect of total darkness as u did with your notebook ? is there any quality differences ?
gneseew said:I bought a vitacon circular polarizer.. but i figured out I can't achieve the effect of total darkness as u did with your notebook ? is there any quality differences ?
gneseew said:I bought a vitacon circular polarizer.. but i figured out I can't achieve the effect of total darkness as u did with your notebook ? is there any quality differences ?
limkopi said:COOL!! I've always wonder abt the effectiveness of my CPL (Raydawn, 52mm) eversince I bought it last yr... Din know there's such an easy way to check... Thanks alot sammy888!
By the way, I did a little expt to my CPL with my notebook (IBM T42) too... Turns fr clear to dark, exactly like sammy888's. However, when I reverse lens, the darker shade turns into a yellowish tint, while the clear part becomes bluish (ie. it turns fr bluish to yellowish)... Quite fun to play with... haha.
sammy888 said:in all my life it has never occur to me to hold it the other way around to see that it DOES NOT WORK! LOL :bsmilie:
LittleWolf said:Isn't experimental physics fun? :bsmilie:
tommon said:It just to me tryiong to get a simple explanation with being too technical. The real technical info will take more than 10 pages to explain the travelling on light particles through various mediums creating various effects. This is not a light spectrometry or scientific forum though photography does involve the use of this science to help us take better pictures.
I recommend that you go the library to read up on these. The reason mose photo retailers recommend CP is becos most lenses have a rotating front element when focusing thus misaligning the polarising effect. Also the light plays an important role as the direction, diffussion, etc affects the effect.
We can go on till the cows come home on the technical aspect, my advise go to a photo retailer with your cam and try it out.
dkw said:But your explanations are totally wrong! And the reason why you need to use a CP on a SLR lens has absolutely nothing to do with a rotating front element, its got to do with the fact that a linear polariser will mess up your metering and/or autofocus.