If you strike Toto that is... But these guys are working professionals and their gear are (mostly) sponsored.nickmak said:Haha... easy way out eh? :bsmilie: Buy a camera body for every lens you have! :bsmilie:
If you strike Toto that is... But these guys are working professionals and their gear are (mostly) sponsored.nickmak said:Haha... easy way out eh? :bsmilie: Buy a camera body for every lens you have! :bsmilie:
Let's create a concensus in a different way :embrass: :Dennis said:Disagree that too many lens kill creativity, you use what you want and need Every focal length have its own impact point and something are always compromised when there are some advantage in another. i.e. zoom (almost always not as sharp and fast as primes, long zoom vs short zoom in terms of distortion etc).
:thumbsup:espn said:Aiyoh, I think we talked too much, let's just go out and shoot
espn said:Aiyoh, I think we talked too much, let's just go out and shoot
Yah....and post post post!! Not buy buy buy all the time! ;pespn said:Aiyoh, I think we talked too much, let's just go out and shoot
Before you say post post post, you better post yours first!!! :kok: :flame:Garion said:Yah....and post post post!! Not buy buy buy all the time! ;p
Garion said:If you strike Toto that is... But these guys are working professionals and their gear are (mostly) sponsored.
Hi Jed. No problems at all. Just hazarding a guess. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. As a working professional yourself, maybe you'd like to enlighten us on whether the photographic equipment used in daily work by photojournalists is sponsored or not? Or does the photog have to pay for his own gears. TIA.Jed said:And where do you get this idea from?
Again, I am not being confrontational.
I am under the impression that as with other professions it all depends on the engagement mode.. employees vs freelancing etc.Garion said:Hi Jed. No problems at all. Just hazarding a guess. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. As a working professional yourself, maybe you'd like to enlighten us on whether the photographic equipment used in daily work by photojournalists is sponsored or not? Or does the photog have to pay for his own gears. TIA.
Garion said:Hi Jed. No problems at all. Just hazarding a guess. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. As a working professional yourself, maybe you'd like to enlighten us on whether the photographic equipment used in daily work by photojournalists is sponsored or not? Or does the photog have to pay for his own gears. TIA.
Not everything works out the way we plan it or like it to Live to learn I guess Cricket is good if you like wine...Jed said:Greece... sore point. We didn't go in the end cause I was supposed to be doing Euro 2004, which we managed to also mess up, so in the end I was just supposed to do the American pre-season football tournament with Man Utd/Liverpool/Celtic/Chelsea, but we ended up not doing that either. So it was just more cricket and tennis. Ah well, and now the footy's started again...
I have no idea of any previous forum history, and neither do I know to whom your comment is directed to.LimCB said:First of all, creativity is lens independent. Creativity is in your mind, not 50 or 35. Zoom or no zoom, another dumb discussion because again, its not the focal lengths that determine what you do, but how you do it.
Like the wanker said, time is better spent shooting.
LimCB said:First of all, creativity is lens independent. Creativity is in your mind, not 50 or 35. Zoom or no zoom, another dumb discussion because again, its not the focal lengths that determine what you do, but how you do it.
Like the wanker said, time is better spent shooting.
marios_pittas said:I have no idea of any previous forum history, and neither do I know to whom your comment is directed to.
However, I really do take issue with your language. If creativity is the result of one's "wholesome" (state of and what's in the mind, the expression of what one feels when one sees, a visual description of what is in front of us after it has gone through the lens) then I have no desire to see your visual expressions as your oral expressions are of low value.
I believe the administrators should take action. It was a decent question, there was a valuable discussion. Vulcar language has its place.. only in the mind of some.
I thought that we are sharing experiences as to what we have found useful. By no means we are defining/demanding that to be creative means you have to use Brand X, Focal Length Y, Lens Type Z, Camera Type W, Film Type A So we are all in accord there.roygoh said:I think what LimCB was trying to say is that a person's creativity is not measured by the amount of equipment he has.
A person who is inherently not creative will not suddenly become creative if he is given a wide range of lenses to shoot with. Nor will his creativity be "created" by forcing him to use only 1 prime lens.
A person who is creative by nature will make the best of what he has, even if it is a disposable camera.
Creativity does not always make up for equipment limitations. You cannot expect a creative person to be able to do astrophotography with just a disposable camera. That is not what I am implying.
Personally, I will not take a person seriously if he says to me "My creativity is killed because I have too many lenses". My assessment of such a person would be that he was never creative enough to start with.
Having said that, I don't agree with LimCB that such discussions can be branded as "dumb".
LimCB has a history of posting irritating remarks, even though he sometimes makes good sense if you can see pass his tone and language.
You can either choose to make the best of his remarks, or attack him. When you attack him, he will retalliate and that usually results in a heated argument that is off topic, wasting everyboy's time, wasting forum resources, and prompting the moderators to close the thread.