Has anyone used this: Apacer Photo Steno Pro II CF Card?


Status
Not open for further replies.

CoolFix

Member
Sep 18, 2004
105
0
16
I have a 256Mb Apacer Photo StenoCF card and I tested it using HD Tach. It achieved a 2.3 mb/sec read burst speed compared to 4.3 mb/sec on a Lexar 80x 1 gb CF card.

I have had no problems with it so far, except that it is not quite as fast as the Lexar.
 

ShaoWei

Member
Aug 27, 2005
143
0
16
Planet Earth
CoolFix said:
I have a 256Mb Apacer Photo StenoCF card and I tested it using HD Tach. It achieved a 2.3 mb/sec read burst speed compared to 4.3 mb/sec on a Lexar 80x 1 gb CF card.

I have had no problems with it so far, except that it is not quite as fast as the Lexar.
Thanks Alot! Any more?
 

eow

Senior Member
Jun 22, 2004
10,110
7
38
dun bother...for reliability and support..u won't go wrong choosing either the sandisk or kingston[lifetime warranty]
 

ShaoWei

Member
Aug 27, 2005
143
0
16
Planet Earth
hahas, I have a lexar and one scandisk already. Want to try out something else ma. But of course but do some research before i get my hands on it.
 

eow

Senior Member
Jun 22, 2004
10,110
7
38
Oic....but refrain from buying those ulu brand if spoilt how?
not worth going thru the hassle when the agent is not even in singapore ...(the nearest agent is at malaysia)
 

ShaoWei

Member
Aug 27, 2005
143
0
16
Planet Earth
eow said:
Oic....but refrain from buying those ulu brand if spoilt how?
not worth going thru the hassle when the agent is not even in singapore ...(the nearest agent is at malaysia)
I see, thanks alot.
 

user111

Senior Member
Jul 27, 2004
4,702
0
36
ulu brand..

stick to sandisk or lexar
 

Status
Not open for further replies.