Golden hours


Status
Not open for further replies.

Myfz1

New Member
Apr 27, 2004
66
0
0
#2
donkuok,

I noticed you have the FujiFilm 4900Z. I am curious to know if the FZ20 takes better photos at 1600x1200 when compared to the fuji. I know the FZ20 is 5mp, so I am not comparing resolution but I am more interested in color and clarity. Hopefully you can post some comparisions.

Thanks very much.
rgds
Myfz1
 

donkuok

New Member
Oct 11, 2004
902
0
0
44
Perth, Australia
#3
Myfz1 said:
donkuok,

I noticed you have the FujiFilm 4900Z. I am curious to know if the FZ20 takes better photos at 1600x1200 when compared to the fuji. I know the FZ20 is 5mp, so I am not comparing resolution but I am more interested in color and clarity. Hopefully you can post some comparisions.

Thanks very much.
rgds
Myfz1
have not tried that. I presume FZ20 would be much better quality than FujiFilm 4900Z. Anyway i may try later
 

donkuok

New Member
Oct 11, 2004
902
0
0
44
Perth, Australia
#4
As requested, I've made a comparison with Fz20 and Fujifilm 4900Z. Here you go...

Fujifilm 4900Z, Auto Balance, ISO125, 1/3s, 1600X1200


FZ20, Auto Balance, ISO100, 1/3s, 1600X1200


Conclusion, FZ20 definitely a winner. I found fujifilm's white balance a bit warmer. FZ20 exhibited correct white balance exact from my eyesight
 

donkuok

New Member
Oct 11, 2004
902
0
0
44
Perth, Australia
#7
JimDavis said:
Seems like Fujufilm 4900Z not as sharp. Also, it exhibits a little more noise than FZ20...
It's considered not bad liao for 3 years ago.
 

Myfz1

New Member
Apr 27, 2004
66
0
0
#8
Thanks for the comparisions. FZ20 really sharp and virtually no noise at iso200.Time to save money for a new FZ20 ;)
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom