what about the 400D underexposure issue is it true? And which one had better noise in high iso???? Thx.
Canon doesn't offer auto ISO, while Nikon does.
The AF system is integrated onto the Canon body, while Nikon offers it on its lenses.
Softness (Non-Sharpness) is dependent on the lenses, not the camera body.
what about the 400D underexposure issue is it true? And which one had better noise in high iso???? Thx.
hehehe... the BBB virus will surely kill me if i keep on buying diff lens that doesnt suit to what i want to shoot....That's the spirit!! Steel yourselves from the horrific BBB (buy-buy-buy) virus!! Haha..
In all seriousness though, a basic and cheap kit will allow you to see a trend of your shots, and then you can decide on better lenses from then on =)
the 400D does have an underexposure issue but not much people are bothered by it. if it bothers u alot, canon can calibrate it for u.
at the present time, only the d300 and d3 are any match to any canon in terms of high iso performance.
Thx for your answer, do you know how much is the lower price for 400D body only? Because I don't want to use the kit lens.
03/03/07 - Cathay Photo - S$1,170 (new, EF Lens Work III, 2GB Sandisk Ultra II CF)
03/04/07 - M S Color - S$1,200 nett
10/06/07 - Alan Photo - S$1,197 (new, 2GB Sandisk Ultra II CF, EF Lens Work III, 20 DVD+R)
14/06/07 - Parisilk - $1,114 (new, 2GB Sandisk Ultra II CF, free camera bag)
Thx for your answer, do you know how much is the lower price for 400D body only? Because I don't want to use the kit lens.
Hi Anatta!Thx for your answer, do you know how much is the lower price for 400D body only? Because I don't want to use the kit lens.
Oh my, I think it's rather inappropriate to constantly hijack another person's thread.
I had gotten myself the same setup as largely recommended here.. the 400D + kit + 50mm/f1.8. Although it's already 2 weeks, I only used it once (shooting at static cars) and quite a high rate of keepers for a 2 weeks old dslr newbie..:lovegrin:
Both lenses turn up nice images but the 50mm is really much better. After reading your thread, I will also follow the advises herein to shoot more, learn the camera and myself more to narrow down on the choices of lens..
Best thing I find about acquiring the 400D was that I also acquired a very nice bunch of friends who are all members of CS. They are friendly, fun loving and some with very poisonous level of viruses...kekekeekekek.
I just in a dilemma right now between buying D40 or the 400D, because I heard that the 400D got problem with underexposure problem occasionally, and I also heard that 400D pic is too soft compared to D40, and my final complain is that 400d don't have auto iso (only auto 100-400). But in the other hand D40 don't have motor in body. How about noise which one is better?? is the rumor true about the underexposure problem and don't have auto iso till 1600??? please help me to solve my dilemma. Thx.
Thanks Diver-hloc and Teegongkia for the great suggestions!!
i would love to get the Tamron lens... but i'll see to it if my budget allows me to get 400D Body and a Tamron...
Should be looking to pay about S$1740 for the 400D body plus Tamron 17-50 2.8. Maybe you could get it cheaper since you are buying both at the same time
Thanks Mark!...thats kinda over my budget :sweat: but i really hope to get them at a cheaper price.... or maybe i could get a 2nd hand Tamron:think:.... still considering though...