Just wondering, anybody did a comparison for the overall cost to build up a system between full frame DSLR and APS-C DSLR for the lenses?
As an example:
50D
EF-S 10-22
EF-S 17-55 or 18-55
EF 70-200
EF 100 Macro
Plus other primes
5D
EF 16-35
EF 24-70
EF 70-200
EF 100 Macro
Plus other primes
(just a suggestion, anybody has better idea for the combination?)
One of the problem about the system between FF and APS-c is EF or EF-S.
No one is going to know how long down the road Canon will still producing EF-S.
And for next few years, APS-c series (IMHO) might be gradually replaced by FF (FF sensor getting more and more affordable).
As an example:
50D
EF-S 10-22
EF-S 17-55 or 18-55
EF 70-200
EF 100 Macro
Plus other primes
5D
EF 16-35
EF 24-70
EF 70-200
EF 100 Macro
Plus other primes
(just a suggestion, anybody has better idea for the combination?)
One of the problem about the system between FF and APS-c is EF or EF-S.
No one is going to know how long down the road Canon will still producing EF-S.
And for next few years, APS-c series (IMHO) might be gradually replaced by FF (FF sensor getting more and more affordable).