Hi bros,
was shooting a wedding sometime back and was approached by someone, this guy saw me using 2 x 40D for wedding shoot and he straight away told me a real photographer never use a crop body for photo shoot.
Like to hear some view from bros here and i know some of you here are pros, so is it a must to have FF body in order to do wedding shoot?
regards
Then the real real photographers are the boffins at NASA who have definitely bigger brains behind their camera--the Hubble Space Telescope which is largest camera known in the universe :sweat:Why can't we all be politically "incorrect" for once?
All things being equal, a better equipment does a better job. Plain and simple. I can provide u with tons of other saying..
As saying goes, going to a "branded" school does not makes a genius.
Having a university degree does not guarantee success.
Money does not give u happiness.
etc... etc...
Yes, i do agree, it's the photographer that matters. True.
But a good photographer can take better pictures with better equipment than himself with a lousier equipment. Plain and simple.
Micheal Jordan vs Himself. One in slippers, one in the latest Air Jordan. Who u bet on to win?
Why is everyone so eager to be political correct and refuses to see the statement in the most basic of manners?
Baffles me....
Why can't we all be politically "incorrect" for once?
All things being equal, a better equipment does a better job. Plain and simple. I can provide u with tons of other saying..
As saying goes, going to a "branded" school does not makes a genius.
Having a university degree does not guarantee success.
Money does not give u happiness.
etc... etc...
Yes, i do agree, it's the photographer that matters. True.
But a good photographer can take better pictures with better equipment than himself with a lousier equipment. Plain and simple.
Micheal Jordan vs Himself. One in slippers, one in the latest Air Jordan. Who u bet on to win?
Why is everyone so eager to be political correct and refuses to see the statement in the most basic of manners?
Baffles me....
Then the real real photographers are the boffins at NASA who have definitely bigger brains behind their camera--the Hubble Space Telescope which is largest camera known in the universe :sweat:
In Hollywood there is a saying: you are only as good as your last project. I guess the same applies to photography. A good photographer only presents the good photos out of many NG ones, of course being professional the NG rate should be much lower.
Personally there are two reasons why I'd move to FF.
1) Wides
2) Shallower DOF compared to crop
3) Better(subjective) IQ
If TS is happy and producing good shots with his current setup, why the need to change?
No says says he have to.
Just that if he is given a better equipment, there's more freedom to express his photography skills....
That's the point the camera store owner is making.
Unfortunately, he won't be given any camera equipment. He would have to purchase it for a cost at a camera shop. Most of the times, pro photographers have to justify the cost of what they pay for. If they can't justify the extra cost incurred from switching to a FF setup(which would mean buying new lenses as well), then they just wouldn't do it.
Stop it with the dude(s), frankly it's quite irritating and rather douchey.
I think the main point here is the guy telling TS that real wedding PGs only use FF bodies, which is completely untrue.
Take it easy. You made a common mistake with the "all things being equal" part. Can we equate the qualitative elements of two different photos?Dude.. u totally misunderstood my point. (is it so hard to understand?, lol)
Everything else being equal, if u hold a pns camera, vs u hold a FF camera. Which one do u think u are likely to produce a better picture??
Plain and simple question, rite?
I'm not compare u vs another person. I'm compare u vs urself. Having better equipments "tends" to produce better result (on the basis that u are competent in using it).
The keyword is "tends".
Hi bros,
was shooting a wedding sometime back and was approached by someone, this guy saw me using 2 x 40D for wedding shoot and he straight away told me a real photographer never use a crop body for photo shoot.
Like to hear some view from bros here and i know some of you here are pros, so is it a must to have FF body in order to do wedding shoot?
regards
Take it easy. You made a common mistake with the "all things being equal" part. Can we equate the qualitative elements of two different photos?
Who is to tell a photo from a cropped camera has lower quality than one from a full frame?
Quality is something much more than that you see from pixel-peeping, not that I doubt you wound't understand, but it is hard to compare.
Quality can't be in your "all things being equal" statement, so your point is invalid.
And BTW stop using dudes, oh please.
If you print in large prints, yes. Shots from FF cameras do make a difference (in terms of noise control).Hi bros,
was shooting a wedding sometime back and was approached by someone, this guy saw me using 2 x 40D for wedding shoot and he straight away told me a real photographer never use a crop body for photo shoot.
Like to hear some view from bros here and i know some of you here are pros, so is it a must to have FF body in order to do wedding shoot?
regards
Canon 5D Mk II - Full Frame (approx RRP $4,299 for the body)
Canon 1D Mk IV - 1.3 Crop Sensor (approx RRP $7,299 for the body)
so... how? with regard to this thread, which is better? :sticktong
U guys amuses me. Seriously. I'll leave it as that.
U guys amuses me. Seriously. I'll leave it as that.