A argonmt New Member Jan 24, 2007 67 0 0 44 Jan 26, 2007 #1 I have a noobish question, IS (Image stabilizer) is more useful for short range lens (17 - 50mm) of telezon lens (70 - 200 mm)?
I have a noobish question, IS (Image stabilizer) is more useful for short range lens (17 - 50mm) of telezon lens (70 - 200 mm)?
hortwizer New Member Feb 6, 2006 392 2 0 Jan 26, 2007 #2 IS is more useful for telephoto lens and for people with shaky hands.
A Artosoft Senior Member Aug 31, 2005 3,710 0 0 Tanjong Katong Jan 26, 2007 #3 IS only help to reduce shaking at camera and lens. If the image blur because subject's movement, IS can't help. Flash will help. IIRC, IS also not very useful for macro distance. Regards, Arto.
IS only help to reduce shaking at camera and lens. If the image blur because subject's movement, IS can't help. Flash will help. IIRC, IS also not very useful for macro distance. Regards, Arto.
Y yanyewkay Senior Member Sep 22, 2004 3,924 0 0 Cons digger. Jan 26, 2007 #4 you'll see the effects better on longer lenses.. for shorter lenses.. proper hand holding techniques are usually sufficient.. else you'll need a tripod.
you'll see the effects better on longer lenses.. for shorter lenses.. proper hand holding techniques are usually sufficient.. else you'll need a tripod.