F1.8 vs F3.2


Status
Not open for further replies.

mpenza

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2002
12,938
0
0
Singapore
www.instagram.com
#1
Say I take a 1s shot using F1.8. How many seconds would it take for a F3.2 lens to get the same level of exposure? Are there any formula I could use?
 

Jed

Senior Member
Jan 19, 2002
3,911
0
0
UK
Visit site
#2
I'm sure there's a complex mathematical formula somewhere, but use the following table until someone coughs it up:

f1.4
-- f1.6
-- f1.8
f2.0
f2.8
-- f3.2
-- f3.5
f4

Each figure on the left column is a full f-stop, while the indicated figures on the right at the universally accepted (for convenience) 1/3 stops.
So f1.8 is 1 and 2/3 stop faster than f3.2, hence you should use that amount a lengthier shutter speed, or 3s.
 

YSLee

Senior Member
Jan 17, 2002
2,326
1
38
Visit site
#3
f/3.6 will be 2 stops faster than f/1.8, so f/3.2 will be slightly less than 2s?
 

Jed

Senior Member
Jan 19, 2002
3,911
0
0
UK
Visit site
#4
No, two stops away from 1s is 4s (1s, 2s, 4s, 8s, etc.) So it's slightly less than 4s.
 

mpenza

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2002
12,938
0
0
Singapore
www.instagram.com
#5
Thanks guys for enlightening me! :)

So, roughly every "1.414" times is one stop loss in light requiring doubling of the exposure time right?
 

Jed

Senior Member
Jan 19, 2002
3,911
0
0
UK
Visit site
#6
Yes that's right. Cause apertures are measured as a reciprocal ratio of the diameter, area wise. Hence the number is achieved by a root of two, which is 1.414 etc as you point out.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom