Ha! Was in exactly the same situation last year...in the end guess what I picked?Originally posted by Jethro
Which is a better camera, EOS 5 or EOS 30?:bsmilie:
You got EOS 30!Originally posted by AdamGoi
Ha! Was in exactly the same situation last year...in the end guess what I picked?
If I had to choose, I would take the EOS30.Originally posted by Jethro
Which is a better camera, EOS 5 or EOS 30?:bsmilie:
The EOS 5 has been in production for about 10 years give and take. One of the longest running production at Canon. Think about the number of people that owns this camera. Do you think Canon is stupid enough to turn its back on these owners? Think not.Originally posted by docile
If I had to choose, I would take the EOS30.
5 is real backdated ... plus seems alot of issues with broken knobs.. and the fact that its no more in production... wat if spoilt and in few yrs time and no parts to make repairs?
I don't mind about the production things.Originally posted by docile
If I had to choose, I would take the EOS30.
5 is real backdated ... plus seems alot of issues with broken knobs.. and the fact that its no more in production... wat if spoilt and in few yrs time and no parts to make repairs?
sorry, please ignore this lens (since it is so expensive).Originally posted by docile
EF 50mm f/1.0L USM ??
think 1.5k not enough for that lens itself...
thanks!Originally posted by AdamGoi
For a budget of $1.5k, may I suggest that you get a EOS 30, EF 50mm f/1.8 II and a Speedlite 420EX! You'll still have $$ left to buy film and batteries!
With an EOS 30 and the 50 f1.4, you probably won't see much of the 1.5k left.Originally posted by 007
thanks!
btw, why not
EF 50mm f/1.4 USM?:dunno:
EF 50mm f/1.8 cost abt $140Originally posted by 007
thanks!
btw, why not
EF 50mm f/1.4 USM?:dunno:
I've owned both the 5 and 30 at one time and found that the 5 is faster in most situation, especially low light.Originally posted by street
--- faster AF...( but this in terms of milliseconds)