EOS 35d?


Status
Not open for further replies.

DT_

New Member
Nov 4, 2005
883
0
0
yeahh! .. this's something very new.. very similar to that blur pic with 85L..

for some reason.. i think it's real.. actually 1 tried following the URL printed on the manual.. canon.jp/35d .. although it doesnt show me anymore of the new 35D... but.. but! IT IS A VALID URL, that instead direct me to 5D page.. i tried with other URL, canon.jp/30d, canon.jp/31d, canon.jp/32d, etc... only the 35D redirect, the rest jus error 404... other workable are like current models canon.jp/20d, canon.jp/1ds, etc..

SO! .... u know i know... ;)
 

Castlesinthesky

New Member
Aug 11, 2003
1,004
0
0
Earth,Heaven and Beyond
DT_ said:
yeahh! .. this's something very new.. very similar to that blur pic with 85L..

for some reason.. i think it's real.. actually 1 tried following the URL printed on the manual.. canon.jp/35d .. although it doesnt show me anymore of the new 35D... but.. but! IT IS A VALID URL, that instead direct me to 5D page.. i tried with other URL, canon.jp/30d, canon.jp/31d, canon.jp/32d, etc... only the 35D redirect, the rest jus error 404... other workable are like current models canon.jp/20d, canon.jp/1ds, etc..

SO! .... u know i know... ;)

sure or not, go try canon.jp/50d , canon.jp/55d etc

same thing.
 

DT_

New Member
Nov 4, 2005
883
0
0
in another word, i mean that i think canon is already preparing their website address for their new model.. this is it.. http://canon.jp/35d .......
 

SpitFir3

New Member
May 2, 2003
869
0
0
Habourfront
DT_ said:
yeahh! .. this's something very new.. very similar to that blur pic with 85L..

for some reason.. i think it's real.. actually 1 tried following the URL printed on the manual.. canon.jp/35d .. although it doesnt show me anymore of the new 35D... but.. but! IT IS A VALID URL, that instead direct me to 5D page.. i tried with other URL, canon.jp/30d, canon.jp/31d, canon.jp/32d, etc... only the 35D redirect, the rest jus error 404... other workable are like current models canon.jp/20d, canon.jp/1ds, etc..

SO! .... u know i know... ;)

No way dude! I was so glad at first. thought it was real. However..try /45d /55d /25d

website thinks you entered wrongly and entered one more number before the 5 so it redirects you to 5d webpage
 

DT_

New Member
Nov 4, 2005
883
0
0
Castlesinthesky said:
sure or not, go try canon.jp/50d , canon.jp/55d etc

same thing.

oh.. all the /5*D works too.. but how come not all the /3*D ... :think: :think:
 

DT_

New Member
Nov 4, 2005
883
0
0
SpitFir3 said:
No way dude! I was so glad at first. thought it was real. However..try /45d /55d /25d

website thinks you entered wrongly and entered one more number before the 5 so it redirects you to 5d webpage

arrr bass.. piaseh.. :bsmilie: :bsmilie: :bsmilie: .. gd point.. but still somehow i think the pic could be real...
 

monsoon

New Member
Oct 5, 2004
416
0
0
but wat new lens will appear in PMA? now we only know 85/1.2L II USM
 

monsoon

New Member
Oct 5, 2004
416
0
0
I hope new 100-400 Is...
 

user111

Senior Member
Jul 27, 2004
4,702
0
36
JediForce4ever said:
huh?what more can they upgrade?:dunno:
maybe 100-400 f4 (constant aperture) L IS USM :D :eek:
 

user111

Senior Member
Jul 27, 2004
4,702
0
36
the picture looks good! at least the grip-to-body area now looks more neater than the 20d
 

monsoon

New Member
Oct 5, 2004
416
0
0
user111 said:
maybe 100-400 f4 (constant aperture) L IS USM :D :eek:
f4 @ 400mm will be a large and exp lens....100-300 f4 better...
 

DT_

New Member
Nov 4, 2005
883
0
0
user111 said:
the picture looks good! at least the grip-to-body area now looks more neater than the 20d
yea.. fake or real.. the pic sure see already shiok...
 

JediForce4ever

Senior Member
Aug 16, 2005
3,157
0
0
Singapore, CanonGraphers.org
RossChang said:
hmmm... 100-400 Is Mk2 with a twist zoom instead of push pull will be good... wuahahaha:bsmilie:
yeah...a twist zoom for the 100-400mm IS and would be good:thumbsup: .....the vacum cleaner is just sucking in too much dust.:thumbsd:
 

henavs

Senior Member
Dec 23, 2002
1,643
1
38
42
studiolabmaster said:
17-500 L will be good!!!all in one:bsmilie: :bsmilie: :bsmilie:
tat's gonna weight a ton...:sweat:
 

henavs

Senior Member
Dec 23, 2002
1,643
1
38
42
wishing for a 15-85mm f/2.8L ... :p
 

Status
Not open for further replies.