EF 100mm vs EF-S60mm (f/2.8 Macro USM)


Status
Not open for further replies.

wahzhai

New Member
Nov 15, 2007
7
0
0
Redhill
#1
I'm not able to decide :dunno: which of above I shld get. Any tips will be greatly appreciated! Thx...;)
 

Dream Merchant

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 11, 2007
9,660
6
38
#2
A lot of it depends on what you're going to shoot, and whether you need the extra working diatsnce.
 

daohuay

New Member
May 10, 2006
339
0
0
Jurong West
#3
I'm not able to decide :dunno: which of above I shld get. Any tips will be greatly appreciated! Thx...;)
i will prefer EF-S60mm cos i dun always bring a tripod with me just shorten ur dist to the subject will do. For 100mm u need to control ur hand from shaking.
 

Denosha

Senior Member
Dec 25, 2003
1,287
0
36
Bukit Timah
www.sgl.per.sg
#4
Definately the 100mm macro. Better build. Non-EFS so if/when u upgrade to FF, you can still use it + normal extension tubes/TCs will work if you want more magnification. The longer working distance makes it easier to shoot the more jumpy insects.
 

wahzhai

New Member
Nov 15, 2007
7
0
0
Redhill
#5
Thanks Dream Merchant, daohuay & Denosha for your opinions!

My main intention is shooting macros, but I thought it will be helpful to have that extra distance too. I went to the bird park but my 17~85mm lens is limiting that "3D" stand-out effect on those birds that are a few meters away. Will this 100mm helps? I read from the previews that both are great lenses, deliver sharp images (and both are slow in focusing under dim light environment) but none really compares the two.

I'm ok with carrying the tripod, and it's plus that the non EF-S lenses can mount to a wider range of Canon DSLRs.

Lastly, I heard that the lenses price is cheaper in Hong Kong. Any recommended shop, retailers? If there is already a thread on this topic, do point me to it.

Any more tips/advice are appreciated!!! Thanks... ;)
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom