E-500 full review from dpreview is out!


Status
Not open for further replies.
Nov 13, 2003
691
0
0
32
Sg
#2
Argh... u just beat me to it... :p

u posted 7:29... my reply @ 7:30....
 

ykkok

New Member
Feb 24, 2004
532
0
0
#3
hammer_400 said:
Argh... u just beat me to it... :p

u posted 7:29... my reply @ 7:30....
hammer_400,

That's not important, but the good ratings that E-500 gets is...:bsmilie:
 

ch5800

New Member
Jun 7, 2004
546
0
0
#4
A first time in history that he give highly recommended for a Olympus Camera??
 

ykkok

New Member
Feb 24, 2004
532
0
0
#5
ch5800 said:
A first time in history that he give highly recommended for a Olympus Camera??
No, I think they did for Olympus C-8080.
 

nightpiper

Senior Member
Oct 20, 2003
2,152
0
0
#6
did any of u guys notice some samples were taken using the 35-100mm lens? :bigeyes:

AMAZING QUALITY!!!



DROOL LAH!!
 

locksley

New Member
Jan 26, 2004
565
0
0
38
Central Area
#7
Too bad not vertical grip

Me pending approval from "Finance Minister"

Seem like US having better promotion

body + kit lens + 40-150 = $899

Which is 899 X 1.66 = about 1.5k SGD

time to call me buddy in San Francisco
 

tao

Senior Member
Jan 7, 2005
3,767
1
38
Beach Road
#8
Very detailed review indeed. The amount of improvements in terms of onboard processing such as 'lens shading' & increased processing/write speed over the E-300 are more than I initially thought when reading the specs.

Heee... I got approval from missus to go ahead to buy it liao... now waiting for it to arrive on our shores. :)
 

koolz

New Member
Nov 13, 2004
445
0
0
28
East
#9
locksley said:
Too bad not vertical grip

Me pending approval from "Finance Minister"

Seem like US having better promotion

body + kit lens + 40-150 = $899

Which is 899 X 1.66 = about 1.5k SGD

time to call me buddy in San Francisco
Wow, help us MO lenses!:devil:
 

Nov 13, 2003
691
0
0
32
Sg
#10
nightpiper said:
did any of u guys notice some samples were taken using the 35-100mm lens? :bigeyes:

AMAZING QUALITY!!!



DROOL LAH!!
now i noe why it got 'highly recomended'...
cos if u look at the sample pics.. shot using 14-54... [size=+2]7-14[/size] and [size=+3]35-100[/size]....

oly just needs to loan him the 14-45 or 90-250 with the next e-X... den sure get 'highly recommended' ;p
 

ykkok

New Member
Feb 24, 2004
532
0
0
#11
hammer_400 said:
now i noe why it got 'highly recomended'...
cos if u look at the sample pics.. shot using 14-54... [size=+2]7-14[/size] and [size=+3]35-100[/size]....

oly just needs to loan him the 14-45 or 90-250 with the next e-X... den sure get 'highly recommended' ;p
it's 14-35mm f2.0, not 14-45 !!
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom