Originally posted by Shadus
Did I read this review correctly? Phil is comparing D60 with the D1x and giving at least an equivalent standing for D60 at D1x level. That's a $3500 camera to a $7000 camera!!!
:gbounce: :gbounce: :gbounce:
Originally posted by Shadus
Did I read this review correctly? Phil is comparing D60 with the D1x and giving at least an equivalent standing for D60 at D1x level. That's a $3500 camera to a $7000 camera!!!
:gbounce: :gbounce: :gbounce:
Originally posted by willyfoo
He did mention that before the D100 is out, the D1x is the closest comparison, which he did the comparison with first. He also mentioned that although image quality may be on par, but that is only one part of what makes a good camera, the other features of the D1x beats the D60...
Originally posted by YSLee
That's right. You can beat up on the D1x, you can't do the same with the D60. I'm sure the shutter lag and focussing is much better with the D1x.
Originally posted by ckiang
The D1X will focus much faster, and in lower light conditions than the D60. And with an AFS lens, the D1X will definitely focus faster than the D60 with USM. :rbounce:
Originally posted by YSLee
That's right. You can beat up on the D1x, you can't do the same with the D60. I'm sure the shutter lag and focussing is much better with the D1x.
Originally posted by Red Dawn
hmm.....D1x will focus much faster, better in low light conditions, and take a noiser picture with more noise, and more jpeg artifacts. yeah, it has more of everything :rbounce:
of course the D1x has to win somewhere, for the price it commands (double that of a D60...)
if not where to hide its face?
uh-oh, jed will be after me for that one