My thoughts are as follows because i was initially considering the k-5 over the d7000. But when i visited emjay's site, the 16-50 was like 1.9k?? Shouldnt pentax be a cheaper brand than the rest since they save so much on advert?
No offence to any pentax users here btw. I've consistently seen good/exceptional pics from the camera, but if the price is more than the canonikon counterparts, and a small BnS market to turn to for 2nd hand stuff, i don't think i wanna stick to my kit lens for the rest of my life.
The k-5 is WOW, but the lenses that i can pair with it, especially walk-about zooms, are just the 18-55, 18-135 and the 16-50. Can someone please prove my argument wrong? i might be missing something here.
Appreciate any and all inputs ;p
No offence to any pentax users here btw. I've consistently seen good/exceptional pics from the camera, but if the price is more than the canonikon counterparts, and a small BnS market to turn to for 2nd hand stuff, i don't think i wanna stick to my kit lens for the rest of my life.
The k-5 is WOW, but the lenses that i can pair with it, especially walk-about zooms, are just the 18-55, 18-135 and the 16-50. Can someone please prove my argument wrong? i might be missing something here.
Appreciate any and all inputs ;p