Digital Life 10-megapixel 400D vs D80 shootout today


Status
Not open for further replies.

akira

New Member
Apr 24, 2003
139
0
0
Singapore
Visit site
#1
Wow, was hoping they would do a good job but what a big let down of a "showdown". :thumbsd: When I flip passed the page, I thought I had pages missing in my paper :confused: Just an abstract comparison chart and over-simplified opinions from two journalists is the best they can offer??? :bigeyes:
 

Stoned

Senior Member
May 7, 2004
4,378
0
0
30
Changi
www.photo.net
#2
I thought the same thing too. I flipped up and down to see if they would continue on another page and I even checked the page numbers to see if there were any missing pages. Quite funny actually. :bsmilie:
 

direwuff

New Member
Mar 27, 2005
909
0
0
#3
quite a weak attempt i thought.. no much useful content at all
 

jsbn

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2002
2,944
0
0
Planet Eropagnis
#4
akira said:
Wow, was hoping they would do a good job but what a big let down of a "showdown". :thumbsd: When I flip passed the page, I thought I had pages missing in my paper :confused: Just an abstract comparison chart and over-simplified opinions from two journalists is the best they can offer??? :bigeyes:
I dun expect them to give an in-depth coverage anyway. :bsmilie:
 

myap

New Member
May 13, 2005
3
0
0
#5
Perhaps they are protecting their own interest; advertising $$$ first to keep their job and a fat year end bonuses.

Which is better they cannot say it outright or might stand to lose out on advertising $$$. Well both are just as aggressive in placing their ads on D80 & 400D with their recent launch.

To both advertisers ... advertisement $$$ first.:lovegrin:
Got to spend lots of money... then can talk.
No money no talk.

Now both pay many many money .... many many more $$$ in the pocket.:lovegrin:
Better play safe ... just show show only and no anyhow talk talk.
Still make money alot and why must kaykiang or kaypoh to talk talk.

:bsmilie: :bsmilie:
 

akira

New Member
Apr 24, 2003
139
0
0
Singapore
Visit site
#6
myap said:
Perhaps they are protecting their own interest; advertising $$$ first to keep their job and a fat year end bonuses.

Which is better they cannot say it outright or might stand to lose out on advertising $$$. Well both are just as aggressive in placing their ads on D80 & 400D with their recent launch.

To both advertisers ... advertisement $$$ first.
Got to spend lots of money... then can talk.
No money no talk.

Now both pay many many money .... many many more $$$ in the pocket.
Better play safe ... just show show only and no anyhow talk talk.
Still make money alot and why must kaykiang or kaypoh to talk talk.
Yup, they are VERY safe.
50/50 iffy iffy score... One "prefers" the D80 and the other "might buy" the 400D :bsmilie:
Neither one will commit to anything :sweatsm: Feels like I'm watching the home shopping network :bigeyes:
 

jdredd

New Member
Mar 30, 2006
1,266
0
0
#8
HELLO... what do u expect? its a IT newsletter they hav eto cover everything..

cant expect DPREVIEW standard of analysis..

and in any event, in terms of resolution, u dont need a shoot out to know that the difference between 8 and 10mp is marginal at best and unless you pixel peep, not really discernible in smaller prints.
 

akira

New Member
Apr 24, 2003
139
0
0
Singapore
Visit site
#9
jdredd said:
HELLO... what do u expect? its a IT newsletter they hav eto cover everything..

cant expect DPREVIEW standard of analysis..

and in any event, in terms of resolution, u dont need a shoot out to know that the difference between 8 and 10mp is marginal at best and unless you pixel peep, not really discernible in smaller prints.
Well, no point devoting an ENTIRE page to a shootout if they are just repeating some simple info from the manufacturers... I guess the REAL purpose is "advertisement" for Nikon and Canon, and not even very good at that :bsmilie:
 

lifeline

New Member
Sep 17, 2006
20
0
0
#10
ya... i was very disappointed. waited/rushed for it... thought i will get a good summary comparison. in the end, a real letdown. did not even dare to put down self-cleaning in the comparison chart. very sanitised version to please both advertisers.

should have known that for real reviews and opinions, the online reviews, and opinions from users here are going to be tons better.
 

jdredd

New Member
Mar 30, 2006
1,266
0
0
#11
akira said:
Well, no point devoting an ENTIRE page to a shootout if they are just repeating some simple info from the manufacturers... I guess the REAL purpose is "advertisement" for Nikon and Canon, and not even very good at that :bsmilie:
heh.wont disagree there. frankly, the standard of critics here, for anything, movies, cars, IT, really lacks much to be desired. long ago given up on getting any frank and fair appraisal from local printed press.
 

fWord

Senior Member
Jun 23, 2005
3,350
0
0
35
Melbourne, Australia
#12
For a moment I thought that I'd have an answer to my Dad's question...he's still stuck trying to decide which to get as his first DSLR. I'll have to help with research. Looks like I'm out of luck again here.
 

Oct 16, 2003
984
0
0
Visit site
#13
I felt that the review was extremely disappointing... too short and lacking depth. Hehe maybe pple can review and post their review here? ^.^

QX
 

darrrrrrrrrr

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2006
3,209
5
38
30
Singapore
#14
It wasn't even a review! Barely scraping the surface of things.. Seemed like it was taking the P&S approach to DSLRs haha. I was very let down this morning..
 

lsisaxon

Senior Member
Nov 29, 2004
11,941
0
0
#15
jdredd said:
heh.wont disagree there. frankly, the standard of critics here, for anything, movies, cars, IT, really lacks much to be desired. long ago given up on getting any frank and fair appraisal from local printed press.
I think many people in this forum can give better opinions than what was published.. if there was even an opinion in the first place. I don't think it's a proper review at all.
 

jdredd

New Member
Mar 30, 2006
1,266
0
0
#16
lsisaxon said:
I think many people in this forum can give better opinions than what was published.. if there was even an opinion in the first place. I don't think it's a proper review at all.
correct. cos most of us are photographer nuts. so we know about photography. just as the professional car review magazines, they know ALL about cars.

but some of these newspaper reviewers... they rae jack of all trades.. one week review printer, one week review handphone, one week review camera...

to be honest, may as well not bother at all. bet some wouldnt even know the difference btween CCD and CMOS sensor.
 

wrx_sti_22b

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2005
4,968
2
38
42
Compassvale Lane
#17
This article is just showing u both the camera lah. They won't say which one is better. Just generally telling you abt the cameras.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom