Am I right to say that comparing a DLSR with a 1.6x FOV to a 35mm film is the same a comparing a 35mm film to a medium format?
If so, when I take the same shot using medium format can give a a 15R photo without significant loss in sharpness, whese as 35mm can go up to say 8R (both using prime lens). Can I say that using a DSLR with prime lens for the same shot can blow up to say 6R?
I am saying this because the size of the CMOS / CCD in a typical DLSR (less the 1Ds and 1D) is smaller than a 35mm film.
Can fellow CS pls correct me if I am wrong. Thanks.
If so, when I take the same shot using medium format can give a a 15R photo without significant loss in sharpness, whese as 35mm can go up to say 8R (both using prime lens). Can I say that using a DSLR with prime lens for the same shot can blow up to say 6R?
I am saying this because the size of the CMOS / CCD in a typical DLSR (less the 1Ds and 1D) is smaller than a 35mm film.
Can fellow CS pls correct me if I am wrong. Thanks.