Difference between a filter and a UV filter


Status
Not open for further replies.

focusHeart

New Member
Apr 12, 2008
262
0
0
#1
I saw the two different filters in courts. If i'm not wrong the UV filter was priced at $8.50 and the filter was priced at $32.50. It is for 52mm lens. Which should i get if i only want to protect the lens. Thanks :D
 

icebox

New Member
May 29, 2008
115
0
0
#2
Hm filter is the general term. It has to be some ___ filter. UV, ND, etc. Perhaps it's just a better UV filter, thus higher price.
 

Feb 23, 2007
411
0
16
Pandan Gardens
#3
8.50 for a filter?

thats really cheap. considering that i got my 52mm for $10. lol.
 

adiknaim

New Member
Feb 9, 2008
440
0
0
Choa Chu Kang
#4
yah.. i hv bought 2 52mm at 2 diff shops.. both $10 leh... if 8.50 one, scary.. skarly some cheapo no brand kind.. better check..
 

focusHeart

New Member
Apr 12, 2008
262
0
0
#5
if i'm not wrong it's Tokina brand and it was selling at courts mega house in tampines.
 

Legoz

New Member
Mar 7, 2008
1,003
0
0
#6
Tokina is decent. Anyway, UV filter doesnt do much.
 

Octarine

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 3, 2008
12,517
31
48
Pasir Ris
#7
I saw the two different filters in courts. If i'm not wrong the UV filter was priced at $8.50 and the filter was priced at $32.50. It is for 52mm lens. Which should i get if i only want to protect the lens. Thanks :D
Even if you ONLY want to protect the lens you should think twice. Any piece of glas in front of your lens will affect the light going through. There are some pictures here in the forum showing what a cheap filter can do ... nothing useful but plenty of garbage. It doesn't need to be Rodenstock or B+W but 8.50 is a bit too cheap. Hoya is recommended as brand of lower price but still good quality.
 

N582WJ

New Member
Jul 2, 2008
7
0
0
#9
I saw that filter, and actually got one.

I'm also quite interested to know why the other filter $32.50

They didnt state what type of filter it was too. They merely said "Optical filter"
 

Octarine

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 3, 2008
12,517
31
48
Pasir Ris
#10
I saw that filter, and actually got one.
I'm also quite interested to know why the other filter $32.50
They didnt state what type of filter it was too. They merely said "Optical filter"
That is same as to get McDonald's stuff and name it "Nutritious Meal"...
Guys, you spent 4 digit numbers for your camera and then you become stingy about a filter? Nothing about being cost-conscious, but a filter for 10 bucks or less should be out of discussion. Check what you want to get (brand, model, type) and feel free to ask questions about the filter here. But without proper information no proper answer. One cannot verify value for money without a minimum of information.
 

Benosaurous

Senior Member
May 21, 2008
808
0
16
#11
i would say, hoya UV filter is enough for normal lens, unless you are buying the high end lens (those that cost 4 digits or more), you might want to really consider buying a good filter like the B+W (which normally cost up to $200 for the bigger lens) to make sure you are making full use of your ex lens.

oh and to clear things up, UV filter has minimal effect on color temperature kinda not visible to the eye, its just to act as a protector for your lens. And yes, the quality differences between hoya and B+W is really significant, if you are using a real high end lens.

in short, at least get a hoya.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom