DA* 16-50 Any Comments?


Lightbulb

New Member
Jun 17, 2011
257
0
0
#1
Hello all,

I read some mixed reviews of this lens such as dying SDM, poor IQ etc. Anybody owns one and comments?

I suppose SDM AF speed is faster than the entry level DC found on 18-135 WR?
 

detritus

Senior Member
Sep 12, 2009
2,922
3
0
shootingbugs.blogspot.com
#2
Hello all,

I read some mixed reviews of this lens such as dying SDM, poor IQ etc. Anybody owns one and comments?

I suppose SDM AF speed is faster than the entry level DC found on 18-135 WR?
i've got one. happy with it. just find it a bit big and heavy but overall, a fantastic lens. i brought it to hokkaido on my holiday last year, bashed around in the snow with it and the WR was added reassurance. constant F2.8 for that focal range is also very versatile.

i can't speak for other pple but the SDM on my copy is fine. i've had it for abt 1 yr and i use it often. if u're really spooked by it, get the extended warranty. $80 is cheap to cover a lens in that price range as to my knowledge, dead SDM may set u back by abt $300 for a copy thats no longer covered by warranty.

i've never used the new 18-135 but its using a newer DC motor and AF speed is supposed to be quite commendable as well. the AF speed of the 16-50 is ok with me - a few micro-seconds don't really bother me much - i'm not a very demanding user. my copy locks on relatively quickly and decisively.
 

Lightbulb

New Member
Jun 17, 2011
257
0
0
#3
I see. Anyway to rent this lens in Singapore?
 

Gengh

New Member
May 6, 2007
1,984
0
0
Florida
#4
Hello all,

I read some mixed reviews of this lens such as dying SDM, poor IQ etc. Anybody owns one and comments?

I suppose SDM AF speed is faster than the entry level DC found on 18-135 WR?
This lens has been with me for over 3 years (and I wasn't the first owner), and is always with me when I go out shooting except for very specific birding or macro trips. Has survived hot, cold, wet and dry, and produces images that I consider excellent for a fast, wide-angle zoom. SDM failure? Happened to my 50-135, but not the 16-50 so far, it's still going strong. During the early days when the 16-50 was released, there were people complaining about poor optical alignment affecting the IQ, I believe this is something of the past already.

Never handled the 18-135 before, but from when I hear, the new DC motor is quite something. The SDM on the 16-50 is ok but not particularly fast, may not be a match for the DC motor.

I see. Anyway to rent this lens in Singapore?
Nope, no rental for Pentax.... best chance to try is to go for outings and I'm sure some friendly people who have the lens will let you take it for a spin. :)
 

Lightbulb

New Member
Jun 17, 2011
257
0
0
#5
Sure will do! Anyone tried 16-50 on a table tennis match with indoor light? I think even 1D + USM will have trouble there (give new meaning to catch no ball) haha!
 

Last edited:

fengwei

Moderator
Staff member
Aug 25, 2004
14,462
12
0
Queenstown
www.pbase.com
#6
DA*1650 is an excellent lens optically. But the SDM 'problem' does affect its reputation and sale. If you worry about SDM, then don't buy lah. There are always other alternatives out there.

As to AF speed, the newer DC 18-135 is definitely faster than DA*1650, quite a bit faster actually. But they are not in the same group when you comparing lenses. The 18-135 is more or less a good weather lens due to its smaller aperture, but since our Kr/K5 have pretty good high ISO performance, it works okay even indoor as long as the light isn't too dark.

If you wanna try both lenses, join out monthly outing. I'm sure you'd see a few of each in the group :)
 

Oct 28, 2009
328
1
18
#7
I've been using my 16-50 for almost a year now. There's something special optically about the DA* lenses that don't translate into lab/imaging test results. It's crisp, and colours are great. Beats my old Sigma 18-50 2.8 hands down. Price-wise, it's kinda premium though. Some people will buy the Tamron 17-50 2.8, because you can get an FA 50 1.4 for the price difference.
 

CorneliusK

Senior Member
Jan 23, 2010
790
0
16
#8
I am very satisfied with my DA*16-50, as others have mentioned the color and contrast are very good. Its a bit soft wide open esp in the corners but sharpens up ALOT when you stop down. The price is rather high but you need to take the price of other similar lenses into context - the canon equivalent is about $1.5k, the Nikon equivalent is nearly $2k. I basically use it more than any of my other lenses, so it has definitely been good value for me.

I had the SDM in mine die but it was replaced under warranty, had no issues since then.
 

Lightbulb

New Member
Jun 17, 2011
257
0
0
#9
I was thinking of getting 16-50 and 60-250. Wonder will there be opportunity to try both?
 

Yamakasi

New Member
Jan 26, 2008
1,467
19
0
#10
I was thinking of getting 16-50 and 60-250. Wonder will there be opportunity to try both?
i know at least 1 member who hv the 2 lens..so i think there might be some opportunity..

i do hv the 50-135 so if you are interested to try this instead..let me know..;)
 

Lightbulb

New Member
Jun 17, 2011
257
0
0
#13
where can I find sample photos of members here shot with 16-50?
 

Dec 2, 2009
310
1
18
Singapore - West Side
#15
Own da* 16-50 as well tamron 17-50 f2.8

Sharpness wise quite about the same wide open, but da* gets sharper when stop down >f4. And da* produce more "contracy" n saturated colour, which is nicer :)

Size da* on the losing end.. Bigger n heavier.. Using 77mm thread filter..

By the way I own also the da*50-135. It is by far better than the two above when you need higher image quality. If you have more space for the focal length.. One of the best auto focus zoom I can say. Have compare it with my brother"s 5dm2 with 24-105L lens at f4 & f5.6 with same object at the same time, our da* never lose out to the L lens, but with less than half of the price.. ;)
 

oyama85

New Member
Dec 29, 2006
348
0
0
#16
Nice thread.
Own a tamron 17-50, been thinking on jumping towards da 16-50 for a longgg time already too.

Good to know sharpness wide open btw the 2 are similar.
Cause read that da produces nicer colors but softer wide open.
 

pentriot

Senior Member
Apr 30, 2010
1,540
7
38
Guilin in Gombak
#19
Hey Ben, you guys seem to have a lot fun there. Can't wait to go there ourselves before X'mas ...
If possible avoid visiting June period.
It's humid with almost windless and occassionally rain.
On one morning, cannot swim at hotel pool due to weather warning.
 

Top Bottom