You do realise something here about the statement in bold. Currently on CS, we have a large number of people signing up. For whateever reasons there may be, which is none of my beeswax. I will not deny there are diamonds in the rough in both photogs and models. But as I have stated before even on the Newbie thread and on other threads before. As a photog, what is the image I want to create? I was in that position for the past 6 months. Now I know and I am trying different concepts, ideas etc. Of course, I cannot be William Chua or DP for that matter. But what matters most, as I have told some newbies before, is what do you want to take and most importantly, what is the image you want to create. It does not matter which genre. What matters most is the image created. For example, like nightmare, he has created stunning landscapes. William Chua's weddings on WAs are beautiful.
Coaching is very subjective. In what sense, shoot style? PP style? Lighting style? In what way do you want to coach? Even with coaching, sometimes the results will be worse, esp if you are stuck with preconceived notions in mind from your mentor. If you read Zeckson's post, this is where a lot of people fail to realise that portrait photography or whatever genre is something that requires time, patience, heartache, headaches and a lot of thrashing and trashing.