No brand bashing, both taken at ard the same spot by 2 different camera, of same megapixel.
Actually, it's hard to say which medium, or even which brand of film, can capture the "real thing". Even for film, different brands and types produce pictures of different saturation, colour cast etc, so film do not in general reproduce what our eyes see as the real thing. In addition, what your eyes see may be different from what my eyes see, we will never know perhaps, so definition of "real" can be a bit obscure here.Originally posted by misato
This comparison is meaningless without a picture from a Film based SLR camera to determind which one is closer to the real thing.
I think you seriously got a problem, previously, in my thread, I mention names and model you got problem with thatOriginally posted by misato
Seriously Mr. Canon, i dont understand your motive for starting such a thread. If a comparison is to be made, it has to be subjective. Do at least state the model and settings used.
PS: sorry moderator, maybe i'm being too direct here in my post. but just for the records, mentions of names is used only for sacastic reasons and nothing else.
If you have taken the effort to use some THINKING, before you speak, you would have realise i thing,Originally posted by kylelam77
You purposely left out the exact model and had ur headlines as Canon vs Olympus???? Harlo????? Wat is ur agenda? Will u like grow up? If u want to establish which one is better, its a subjective issue and dealt with long enuff. Yes we all know wat a stupendous camera the Canon is. Enuff? Geez....
I'm a idiot.. but your answer doesnt anwser my question.Originally posted by canon
I think you seriously got a problem, previously, in my thread, I mention names and model you got problem with that
Now, I merely ask which photo looks better, (leaving out exact model details, and purposely DID NOT mention which camera took which picture) you also got problem with that.
What an Id*** you.
Then its a self-realisation not within my control. I did what I can, didn't mention the exact camera, even naming the pictures as photo1 and photo2, just want a view on the pictures takenOriginally posted by kylelam77
U don't have to post which camera posted which pic cos the whole forum knows which is posted by which courtesy of some wise crack.
so far, I have yet to see any constructive inputs, including yourself, on how the photos can be better taken, what settings or composure will result in better pictures etc..
If u had bothered to read wat the rest have been writing about u and at the same time mine, u might have perhaps had some sense to realise that the comments were made to allow constructive inputs to photography.
The picture is the closest match I could find, in terms of scene.
And if u had even went thru the thought process becos u claim to want "comments" about the pictures by different manufacturers, u wouldn't have posted 2 pictures of differing times when the time taken was a critical factor.
Originally posted by misato
I'm a idiot.. but your answer doesnt anwser my question.
I only asked why a more subjective comparison wasnt carried out. why specifically only between the 2 brands.