Can't they get their stories straight? Never trust a computer reviewer to review a camera. Here's what another CNET article has said about the E-500 (taken from a quote on DPReview,
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1022&message=16028278 ):
"Description: The Olympus EVOLT E-500 is an 8-megapixel, point-and-shoot camera. Compared to other point-and-shoot digital cameras on the market, it is expensive at around $800. Includes olympus master software."
Since when is an SLR a point & shoot camera?
"Suitability: A point-and-shoot digital camera, suited for casual use. The largest recommend print size, estimated from the camera's resolution, is 12x16 or larger."
LARGEST recommended print size 12x16 or LARGER???
"Value: Overall, this digital camera's price seems hard to justify, with respect to its features. In fact, you would normally pay nearly 35% less to get a point-and-shoot camera having comparable resolution."
That's becuase it ISN'T a point & shoot camera!
This person obviously doesn't know what a point & shoot camera is. A digital camera is not a computer...if you want a good review, read a photography magazine or go to one of the sites that are dedicated to reviewing cameras, not computer sites like CNET.
Never trust a programmer who carries a screwdriver, and never trust computer people to review cameras!