Choosing a micro four third


#1
Hi all,

Just wanna know, on a choice for a micro four third system, which would be a better option?

1. Olympus E-PL3
2. Canon EOS-M
3. Sony NEX 3N.

Thanks, just wanna get a general feel of preference..
 

Hinata76

Senior Member
Apr 15, 2009
2,126
0
36
Singapore
www.flickr.com
#2
2 and 3 is not micro 4/3 system..they are mirrorless systems. same as 1

Nex have focus peaking tweak..so its good if ur using Manual lenses.

1,3, can get EVF to use under direct sunlight..
Dun think Canon have it.

1,3 can use all other lenses via proper adapters but dun expect AF in them.

so my choice is Oly (cos im using a ep3...hee..)


BTW might wanna check what lens u have right now..might be useful if ur getting M4/3 systems.
 

Rashkae

Senior Member
Nov 28, 2005
19,105
12
0
#3
Hi all,

Just wanna know, on a choice for a micro four third system, which would be a better option?

1. Olympus E-PL3
2. Canon EOS-M
3. Sony NEX 3N.

Thanks, just wanna get a general feel of preference..
Only the E-PL3 is micro 4/3s. Why? Because m4/3s is just a TYPE of mirrorless camera. Mirrorless is NOT the same as m4/3s.

Of the 3, the NEX has the biggest sensor (full DSLR APS-C size), but less lenses and the lenses are bigger. You really really need to try them in a shop and decide which one you like best. They all have their own strengths, and what may be important for some may not matter to you.
 

rhino123

Moderator
Staff member
Sep 1, 2006
5,243
15
38
NA
#4
Like what others had mentioned, only EPL3 is a micro 4/3 camera, the others are not.

Of the three... Canon's had the least native lenses available (only 2) with adapter she could fit the EF and EF-S lenses, but up till now, no one know how was the performance if fitted with adapter and using EF and/or EF-S lenses. The focusing speed of Canon's EOS-M is not amazing as was seen from youtube video, but for normal usage it is good enough. I believe that among the three, EPL3 should have the fastest focusing speed.

Of the 3, EPL3 had the smallest sensor (x2 crop factor) and in theory high ISO noise performance is going to be the worst. It also has the least pixel (12MP as compared to Canon EOS-M - 18MP and NEX-3n - 14MP).

Like what Raskhae had mentioned, all three are excellent camera, you would have to go to the shop and have a feel of them (Canon EOS-M is not out yet though), then see which one you like best.
 

#5
Like what others had mentioned, only EPL3 is a micro 4/3 camera, the others are not.

Of the three... Canon's had the least native lenses available (only 2) with adapter she could fit the EF and EF-S lenses, but up till now, no one know how was the performance if fitted with adapter and using EF and/or EF-S lenses. The focusing speed of Canon's EOS-M is not amazing as was seen from youtube video, but for normal usage it is good enough. I believe that among the three, EPL3 should have the fastest focusing speed.

Of the 3, EPL3 had the smallest sensor (x2 crop factor) and in theory high ISO noise performance is going to be the worst. It also has the least pixel (12MP as compared to Canon EOS-M - 18MP and NEX-3n - 14MP).

Like what Raskhae had mentioned, all three are excellent camera, you would have to go to the shop and have a feel of them (Canon EOS-M is not out yet though), then see which one you like best.
Paiseh, apparently I still cannot tell the difference. I've none of the lens for the cameras mentioned above, maybe except for the canon eos-m. I'm looking for one that is more like a general shooting kind, of cos not using it for professional work. Maybe I should have just wrote mirrorless. haha..
 

#6
Only the E-PL3 is micro 4/3s. Why? Because m4/3s is just a TYPE of mirrorless camera. Mirrorless is NOT the same as m4/3s.

Of the 3, the NEX has the biggest sensor (full DSLR APS-C size), but less lenses and the lenses are bigger. You really really need to try them in a shop and decide which one you like best. They all have their own strengths, and what may be important for some may not matter to you.
Personally I've tried handling 1 and 3, somewhat prefer the oly more due to stability of the whole kit. Sony feels awkward becos of the tweety bird design. (big head small body)
 

kei1309

Senior Member
Apr 12, 2010
7,312
23
38
Earth
www.facebook.com
#7
Personally I've tried handling 1 and 3, somewhat prefer the oly more due to stability of the whole kit. Sony feels awkward becos of the tweety bird design. (big head small body)
The E-PL3 has barely any grip which makes it worse to hold. if you're looking at Olympus, i'd suggest you up your budget and get the OM-D
 

wonglp

Moderator
Staff member
Jul 20, 2007
6,816
74
48
Bukit Batok
#9
Feels alright for me though. But no OM-D lah. Personally I feel it looks damn ugly.
Looks is certainly one thing. The OMD sensor performance(which is from Sony) is excellent and big step up from EPL3(hi iso & dynamic range). PLus there are more controls & EVF which will make it easier for DSLR users to switch over. If you set on EPL3, do get the Richard Franiec grip which works well.
 

pinholecam

Moderator
Staff member
Jul 23, 2007
10,944
88
48
#10
Only EPL3 is a m4/3 camera in your list.

Anyway, imo, look at the OMD, G3, GX1 or even G5.
All these use a newer and better 16mp sensor (different sensor between the Oly and Panasonic cameras though)
Personally, I think the OMD is the best one yet for m4/3 (on camera SR; very good JPG), though for the price (1/2 of an OMD) I'd still stick to my G3.

The GX1 was crazy cheap in the US for a short while too.
 

Top Bottom