I always been told that for all the cheaper lens... 18-55mm, 50mm f1.8, 35mm f2 etc.etc. that Nikon ones are better made then Canon??
I was in Funan today, deciding to get a 35mm f2 or not and the salesman started to chitchat with me on other stuff.. so cut story short, he say since I am not one that gonna buy high grade lens, generally speaking Nikon lower range lens are better build then Canon...
( I am a Canon dlsr user btw but no collection of good lens so still can sell and switch)
I been tempted to switch to nikon for few reason: Their JPEG looks nicer.. shutter sound sweeter (this shows how much newbie i am) .. and frens hv more nikon lens i can borrow and try
and if its a fact that low range nikon lens are better then the low range canons.. then I might hv another reason to jump boat ...
pls, this is not a canon vs nikon thing .. i just ask over the basis of the LOWER RANGE LENS like kit kens, 50mm, 35mm .. ie those below sgd$600
I was in Funan today, deciding to get a 35mm f2 or not and the salesman started to chitchat with me on other stuff.. so cut story short, he say since I am not one that gonna buy high grade lens, generally speaking Nikon lower range lens are better build then Canon...
( I am a Canon dlsr user btw but no collection of good lens so still can sell and switch)
I been tempted to switch to nikon for few reason: Their JPEG looks nicer.. shutter sound sweeter (this shows how much newbie i am) .. and frens hv more nikon lens i can borrow and try
and if its a fact that low range nikon lens are better then the low range canons.. then I might hv another reason to jump boat ...
pls, this is not a canon vs nikon thing .. i just ask over the basis of the LOWER RANGE LENS like kit kens, 50mm, 35mm .. ie those below sgd$600