Is anyone able to comment on whether and how Capture NX is superior. I am looking to get this software but struggling to see the difference.
Capture NX would be better in reading the the NEF or file/s coming out of Nikon's camera for the fact they better understand the file format algorithm of NEF...well. the reason is very much obvious but like what more ppl exp it is really sluggish...
another special feature in NX is the U-point which even photoshop doesn't have them. a simple but POWERFUL feature.
actually it's not dat PS dun have it. it's called masks. just dat unless u got the patience to do it mask by mask, NX is faster with U-point. :bsmilie:
there is no comparison bet these products cos they are meant for different audience. lightroom + PS is one of the most common combination used by working pros to quickly organise their RAW files and to do a quick turnard for the RAWs - JPGs. aperture is the apple's version of lightroom + PS (well... almost.. ;p ). NX is not meant to replace PS in any way. it's just dat it's meant to be the best (debatable) processor for NEFs.
How's ur workflow like with NX + LR?hmmm...
NX + LR / CS2
at least that is what i am using...
i tried aperture.. but .... dunno... i just like LR better. (for me)
How's ur workflow like with NX + LR?
Save the new settings in the NEF with NX then import into LR for further post-processing?
actually it's not dat PS dun have it. it's called masks. just dat unless u got the patience to do it mask by mask, NX is faster with U-point. :bsmilie:
there is no comparison bet these products cos they are meant for different audience. lightroom + PS is one of the most common combination used by working pros to quickly organise their RAW files and to do a quick turnard for the RAWs - JPGs. aperture is the apple's version of lightroom + PS (well... almost.. ;p ). NX is not meant to replace PS in any way. it's just dat it's meant to be the best (debatable) processor for NEFs.