In technological advances, can a Sony F707 last for one year? I'm planning to get myself a F707 via installments, but I'm afraid it will become obsolete...
Originally posted by Necroist
Is there any other digicams with the same features as the F707 like ISO Settings\Apeture\Shutterspeed or even better while being lower in MP?
Try the Sony DSC-S85. Quite a decent camera.Originally posted by Necroist
Is there any other digicams with the same features as the F707 like ISO Settings\Apeture\Shutterspeed or even better while being lower in MP?
I believe the F707 is more than enough for most people. What you shoot and how demanding you are should be questioned on the photographer him/herself first, not the camera. Many people just don't take time enough to learn what their cameras can do for them.Originally posted by kamwai
my F707 only lasted 4 mths for me....
actually is depends on what u shoot and how demanding are u lor...if not there is not need to upgrade even there are new model come out
i know what are the good and bad points abt my F707 very well...and i know what i need, and i found that F707 is not good enough to satisfy my need, therefore I was convinced that i need an upgrade.Originally posted by Kit
I believe the F707 is more than enough for most people. What you shoot and how demanding you are should be questioned on the photographer him/herself first, not the camera. Many people just don't take time enough to learn what their cameras can do for them.
Originally posted by Necroist
I did intend to get a normal SLR instead actually but if I count the cost of a good lens, + developing costs of flim and flim costs together with my inexperience and newbieness to photography, its not worth it.
Moreover digital cams allow me to view my pictures immediately, letting me analyse what is right and wrong.
Define "its not worth it". Are you saying you would rather save money on film costs and go digital or are you saying its just plain silly to go with film when there's digital?Originally posted by Necroist
I did intend to get a normal SLR instead actually but if I count the cost of a good lens, + developing costs of flim and flim costs together with my inexperience and newbieness to photography, its not worth it.
Moreover digital cams allow me to view my pictures immediately, letting me analyse what is right and wrong.
I'm not that good with words, what I meant was, at this point of time, it doesn't justify me to get an SLR while I'm still a major newbie in this field.Originally posted by Kit
Define "its not worth it". Are you saying you would rather save money on film costs and go digital or are you saying its just plain silly to go with film when there's digital?
nopeOriginally posted by Necroist
Btw, can a F707 be hooked up into a webcam or something? HEHE.