Buying of new lens


Status
Not open for further replies.
Dec 29, 2006
149
0
0
38
#1
Hi All... say if i have a $400-$500 to spare now...wat lense would be a good lense to buy around this range? currently i have the da 18-55 and 50-200...where can i find sigma
17-70mm ...or maybe i should just splurge on the additional grip and a good tripod?
 

longko

Senior Member
Sep 7, 2006
2,052
1
0
39
Balestier
#2
Hi All... say if i have a $400-$500 to spare now...wat lense would be a good lense to buy around this range? currently i have the da 18-55 and 50-200...where can i find sigma
17-70mm ...or maybe i should just splurge on the additional grip and a good tripod?
IMHO get a good tripod or save a bit more for flash;)
 

Kit

Senior Member
Jan 19, 2002
11,699
42
48
42
Upper Bukit Timah
Visit site
#4
If you are asking how to spend your money, my advise is don't spend at all until you have a better idea.
 

macrob

New Member
Aug 4, 2006
756
0
0
#5
I think maybe you need to got a large aperature lens, like 50/1.4 or 50/1.7. That may cost $350, and then you can spend $150 on a tripod.:bsmilie:
 

NoMoney

New Member
Mar 20, 2007
1,199
0
0
Ang Mo Kio
#8
I would say get a good tripod and ball head. :)

Or perhaps see which type of photography you are into. Since your lenses had covered the basic ranges, it is best to go into something you are interested to shot and get the lens for it. ;)

Just my little comment. :D
 

Vulpix0r

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2002
3,136
0
0
West
#9
I don't really think a tripod is that important if you don't do a lot of night photography.
 

drewdam

New Member
Jun 18, 2005
1,495
0
0
#11
tot we normally have something in mind b4 u plan the budget? true dont just buy because u have 400-500 to spare. it might buy u a white elephant.
 

fengwei

Moderator
Staff member
Aug 25, 2004
14,462
12
0
Queenstown
www.pbase.com
#12
Hi All... say if i have a $400-$500 to spare now...wat lense would be a good lense to buy around this range? currently i have the da 18-55 and 50-200...where can i find sigma 17-70mm ...or maybe i should just splurge on the additional grip and a good tripod?
I'd suggest you to get a faster normal range prime lens first and see if you like the idea (of using a prime lens instead of a zoom). An FA 50/1.4 won't cost more than $350, and it'll get you to a different level for low light handheld photography comparing w/ the other two kits you already have. Of course a manual one will do the trick too if you wanna practise MF ;)

Just don't buy those old S-M-C Takumar ones, those would make you addicted and you'd end up spending alot more on more Takumar lenses :bsmilie:
 

slacker

New Member
Mar 18, 2003
618
0
0
SG
Visit site
#13
lol... agree with fengwei on getting those SMC K or M42 mount lenses. Regard them as cocaine... get hooked quite easily if you get a hang of using MF...
 

Dec 29, 2006
149
0
0
38
#14
thank you all...i bought the SIGMA 17-70mm macro liao...
 

livetofly

New Member
Sep 2, 2005
436
0
0
#16
How much did you pay for it and from where ? I got a quote from MS for $599 few days ago. Is this reasonable ?
599 is slightly too high... try OP may give better price. coz they only sell gray sets.
 

Dec 29, 2006
149
0
0
38
#17
I bargained and bought it at OP with a CL-Polariser at $650...the only place selling at 590 is at TK...but they are left with a last cpy...you might wanna check....OP still has about 3 copies left after i bought the forth one...
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom