A alvinkm Member Dec 4, 2008 128 0 16 Dec 26, 2008 #1 wad must be taken into consideration?.. aperature?....smaller den the background more blur??...is f.3.5 enough?
wad must be taken into consideration?.. aperature?....smaller den the background more blur??...is f.3.5 enough?
sherchoo New Member Sep 14, 2005 667 0 0 51 Bukit Panjang sherchoo.myphotoalbum.com Dec 26, 2008 #2 depends how far is your background.
S ssping83 New Member Jul 25, 2007 1,002 0 0 40 Singapore, Singapore champagne-0910.livejournal.com Dec 27, 2008 #3 you need to google and read up on depth of field.. cheers..
zac08 Senior Member Feb 21, 2005 11,745 0 0 East Dec 27, 2008 #4 DOF... go read. It's dependant on distance of subject to camera, distance of subject to BG and also the aperture used and the coc of the camera.
DOF... go read. It's dependant on distance of subject to camera, distance of subject to BG and also the aperture used and the coc of the camera.
S sprintist Senior Member Nov 13, 2006 5,335 2 38 Singapore www.oddinary.com.sg Dec 27, 2008 #5 alvinkm said: wad must be taken into consideration?.. aperature?....smaller den the background more blur??...is f.3.5 enough? Click to expand... what is enough? its important to know that, to know what you want to keep in focus before throwing everything else away not the other way round
alvinkm said: wad must be taken into consideration?.. aperature?....smaller den the background more blur??...is f.3.5 enough? Click to expand... what is enough? its important to know that, to know what you want to keep in focus before throwing everything else away not the other way round
