Hi everyone,
Can the experts advise me which micro lens is most value for money under $1000? Regardless of brand.
Can the experts advise me which micro lens is most value for money under $1000? Regardless of brand.
You may look up Tamron 90mm F2.8 macro lens for a starter.
You may look up Tamron 90mm F2.8 macro lens for a starter.
Like 90mm or 160mm, is it means that how far you can stand?:dunno:
Or can I say that the bigger the mm, the better it is. e.g 90mm is better than 60mm?
Like 90mm or 160mm, is it means that how far you can stand?:dunno:
Or can I say that the bigger the mm, the better it is. e.g 90mm is better than 60mm?
The bigger the mm does not mean that it is better. What is does mean is the field of view (you can search the web to read about FOV) you get changes, and also the distance you can stand away from the subject to shoot it to get the same size object in your picture.
For example, if you are shooting some toy cars close up, or food, a 50-60mm macro lens would be more useful. If you are shooting a diamond ring, a 90-100mm would be better. If you are shooting insects, a 100+mm lens would be more useful.
Having sad that, it does not mean you cannot shoot insects with a 60mm macro lens, nor does it mean that you cannot shoot toy cars with a 100mm lens. It is sometimes preference and ease of use because of the distance you have to stand to get the framing you want in the picture.
Thanks! This is a very useful piece of information to me!
Tamron 90mm... :thumbsup:
best for those on a budget.
Ok! Next question. What must I pay attention to when selecting a flash for macro shooting? e.g. bugs and flowers.
Once again, I thank all of you for the expertism.