Best camera for continuous shooting


Status
Not open for further replies.

alpie

New Member
Mar 11, 2004
181
0
0
Singapore
#1
Hi,
I currently use a Fuji S602, its continous mode can shoot 5 fps (first 5 frames or last 5 within 8 secs) at 3 megapixels (or interpolate to 6mp).

I would like to upgrade to a higher megapixel camera (SLR or SLR like), but somehow they all seem to have very low continuous mode ratings.

I also like the handiness of video capture at 640x480 with sound & unlimited-time. Somehow I don't see these features in newer cameras.

Am I missing something here?
 

nickmak

Senior Member
Apr 16, 2004
2,358
0
0
31
London, UK
www.pbase.com
#2
alpie said:
Hi,
I currently use a Fuji S602, its continous mode can shoot 5 fps (first 5 frames or last 5 within 8 secs) at 3 megapixels (or interpolate to 6mp).

I would like to upgrade to a higher megapixel camera (SLR or SLR like), but somehow they all seem to have very low continuous mode ratings.

I also like the handiness of video capture at 640x480 with sound & unlimited-time. Somehow I don't see these features in newer cameras.

Am I missing something here?
Continuous mode? The 1D Mark II can shoot at 8.5 fps! almost a movie... SLRs don't have movie mode...
 

alpie

New Member
Mar 11, 2004
181
0
0
Singapore
#3
4500 USD +sales tax :bigeyes: :bigeyes:

That's a pretty big jump from my 300 USD worth S602 :bsmilie:
No wonder there are not many S602s for sale. People! hold onto your S602s as they are unique! :thumbsup:

Maybe Fuji can come up with a reasonably priced high megapixel camera with features similar to those of S602. S7000 was a disappointment...

Hey Fuji!!! Hear my voice!!! We need a 6-8MP camera with 28-xx zoom lens, 5 fps at least 5 frames, 640x480 unlimited video, up to 800 ISO, good size CCD, under 1000 USD.

And it shouldn't weigh 2 kgs :bsmilie:
It is eventually a camera for taking family pictures...
Cheers!
 

justarius

Senior Member
Nov 9, 2003
1,226
0
36
Northeast
Visit site
#4
Why do you need so high a frame rate? You might find that a digital video camera with a still capture feature might be of more use to you. :D
 

nickmak

Senior Member
Apr 16, 2004
2,358
0
0
31
London, UK
www.pbase.com
#5
justarius said:
Why do you need so high a frame rate? You might find that a digital video camera with a still capture feature might be of more use to you. :D
yea true... then DV cam can also take pics! Good idea justarius!
 

2100

Senior Member
Mar 3, 2004
3,591
0
0
48
#6
Well, with a D70 and Ultra II card, you can whack all the way past 100 frames @ 3fps, largest resolution but in middle quality. Each file is around 1.5-2MB. For fast paced events, action shots, instances that the action drags on for a long period (eg bride throwing the bouquet to the sisters, all the way from pre-throw to reaction of the sisters after catching it), i also rarely go past 30 frames in real life lar.

Actually, what can you shoot for 1 second at 5fps and then you run into a full buffer?
 

alpie

New Member
Mar 11, 2004
181
0
0
Singapore
#7
:) Okay... let me explain.

I sometimes take pictures during football matches. 1-2 FPS is not fast enough to capture the action. You know football...

I have a DV cam, but its resolution is around 1 megapixels. Sometimes even 3 MP is not good enough. As the game is very dynamic, I need to capture a relatively large area, then crop the picture where action happens. That's why I am looking for high megapixel camera. With S602, after cropping I may lose the details.
 

justarius

Senior Member
Nov 9, 2003
1,226
0
36
Northeast
Visit site
#8
I'm no sports expert but I think anticipation of the action, focus trapping and knowledge of the game is alot more important to getting your shot than fps.

Just my 2cents worth. :D
 

alpie

New Member
Mar 11, 2004
181
0
0
Singapore
#9
If I could anticipate the action so well, I was making millions of dollars as a goalkeeper ;-)
 

Ah Pao

Senior Member
Nov 7, 2003
1,662
0
36
Singapore
www.facebook.com
#10
Then the photographers from those sports magazines should become goalkeepers...

It's easier to move your camera then to move your whole body, yah? ;)

What justarius says is not wrong. Cropping is an essential technique for sports photography, but I suggest you work on techniques instead of relying too much on hardware. At least you'll still be able to survive in the event someone hands you another camera to document the event.

A decent DSLR (e.g. D70 or 10D, or even a 300D) will serve your needs well.
 

jOhO

Senior Member
Apr 20, 2003
6,485
0
0
41
Singapore
www.expressivelyjoho.com
#12
well it's pretty much easy to decide.. high frame rate cameras are expensive.

so if u can't afford it, u'd have to forgo high frame rate.

if u REALLY need high frame rate, pay the $$.... :)
 

Status
Not open for further replies.