Ok, we all have read the recent hooha about if film is still alive. now lets focus on digital photography for a change.
my question is: r u pissed with digital photography?
why do i ask? well, knowing all these digital 'flaws' like moiré, CA even with top lens, pixelation with extreme enlargements, data corruption with mem card, noise, water colour effect in shadows, crop factor, etc.
do all these problems actually put u off & drag u away from DP? i would like to know how u digi bugs come to compromise with this new technology/format.
if all these problems r totally acceptable, then why the big fuss over film vs digital? so for once, why not tell those who wants to know DP, whats the thing that keeps u hanging on even with such known problems?
my question is: r u pissed with digital photography?
why do i ask? well, knowing all these digital 'flaws' like moiré, CA even with top lens, pixelation with extreme enlargements, data corruption with mem card, noise, water colour effect in shadows, crop factor, etc.
do all these problems actually put u off & drag u away from DP? i would like to know how u digi bugs come to compromise with this new technology/format.
if all these problems r totally acceptable, then why the big fuss over film vs digital? so for once, why not tell those who wants to know DP, whats the thing that keeps u hanging on even with such known problems?