sorry, don't know the bible, you should elaborate if you want to make a point and not assume that everybody reads it. you are really being a tad over-aggressive here; "on the other hand" signifies that i am going ot, if you must need me to say "i am going ot" to get the point, then perhaps you should state it earlier, for i had thought more highly of you than that.
anyways; where is the demonisation? you seem to take this argument too personally, as if you are defending your own choices, rather than feeling about the freedom to make one's choices; if you don't mind me saying. i am not even going to bother to point out that saying that condemning others for spending money wantonly is a "convenient way to make yourself feel superior" could just as easily be applied to "condemning others for condemning others for spending money wantonly". make up your mind, when it comes to your views on judgement; if you must be a happy medium, then sit around and shake hands with the world, instead of flashing double standards so blatantly and labelling others "hypocrites".. perhaps some self-reflection is due? i wonder whose views are not-quite-so thought out.
if that is the case, then there is no need to talk; you have thoroughly ignored the last post before this one, so i assume you are actually more interested in justifying your own choices, much like how a camera user (you have been so long in clubsnap, you should know what i mean) will sit around and throw out points about his brand being superior when he is in actuality trying to justify his own way of life.
you also make no sense here; just because somebody's actions doesn't affect me, it means that i have no right to feel anything about those actions? please read what you are saying, i could throw any number of examples where your words would sound extremely ludicrous (and apathetic) when applied to such scenarios.
this attitude reeks of the 自扫门前雪,莫管他人瓦上霜 syndrome that we are seeing. so if as asterixsg (another member here) had posted earlier, when you see a cab driver declining entry to a disabled member of the public because he is a selfish retard who wants to earn more money quickly; is it not true that people are entitled to feel outraged, and it is justifable?
i suppose you would just watch and say, this is none of my bloody business; in that case, lovely, and i wish you well, since your life views are obviously very different from me, to the extent that it is best that there is zero communication since we would not agree on quite a number of issues.