Any picture quality difference between F2.8 70-200 IS USM Mark I & the new Mark II?


ryanchong

New Member
Dec 31, 2010
4
0
0
50
Anyone tried the two lens? Like to know your comments. Thinking of getting one.
 

Alpina

New Member
May 5, 2010
378
0
0
yes. the mkII is the sharpest between the two.
CA is well controlled and AF is lightning fast.
do a search online and you can find more results.
if you can afford it, get it.
i promise you that you would not regret it.
price ranges from 3.1 to 3.3+k.
 

engrmariano

Senior Member
Oct 18, 2007
3,533
1
36
Rivervale
Anyone tried the two lens? Like to know your comments. Thinking of getting one.
theres this site called google where you can search almost any thing unimaginable... go help your self...
 

syl

New Member
Nov 1, 2005
810
0
0
Singapore
theres this site called google where you can search almost any thing unimaginable... go help your self...
Wow, so in future no one should ask for advice on this forum huh!
 

Entertainer

Member
Sep 10, 2008
361
0
16
Singapore
I have not used the 70-200f2.8 IS Mk 1. But I used to own a 70-200f4IS. used to, because I sold it during my upgrade to 70-200f2.8 IS Mk 2. why? because the Mk 2 is as sharp as the f4IS wide open (f2.8 vs f4), and allows much more light in.

only regret is the weight. not even the money. this lens is worth every cents of what I paid. enough said? ;)
 

Last edited:

giantcanopy

Senior Member
Feb 11, 2007
6,220
3
38
SG