Any idea why my pictures look so dull


eternalSun

New Member
Apr 15, 2010
66
0
0
35
#1
Hi everyone. I've just got myself a D90 not long ago. Went out to take some pictures and realize that most of my pictures are rather dull. Can someone advice me as to what i'm doing wrong? Here's a picture i took in a church. Found the cross rather unconventional

 

Last edited:

eternalSun

New Member
Apr 15, 2010
66
0
0
35
#2
Guys so sorry i'm new to this don't know how to resize the pic.....should i upload a smaller picture instead???
 

magicianhisoka

Senior Member
Sep 14, 2009
1,787
0
36
#5
are you shooting on completely auto settings?
 

ovaltinemilo

Senior Member
Sep 12, 2009
2,819
0
0
Sin jia Po lah
#6
looks like a world map on my tiny 17" screen...haha...

anyway, 1st impression is that the high iso has caused the colour to be off and image to be soft...thus, overall becomes dull:)
if you still get this kinda photo in broad day light scenery, then something is wrong with your sensor...:bsmilie:
 

May 23, 2010
88
1
6
25
Zion Road
#7
read up on the basic of photography in CS.. its so simple tht u dun even need to search...
 

Oct 26, 2006
1,355
0
0
31
toa payoh
#9
Ahh! Church of the Divine Mercy
1) the lighting in the church is real bad
2)visible handshake although high iso is used.
seems like you've taken it before or after mass, or on a weekday.

*solution wait for mass to start,this is probably the only time where they will on the lights.
wait.. you'll also need to compensate your exposure, due to the large amounts of whites behind the dirty bronze crucifix.
 

Last edited:

geraldkhoo

Senior Member
Jun 15, 2007
2,571
0
36
The Tiny Red Dot
sgstrobist.blogspot.com
#10
You can take a better pic, or do some editing to make it a better pic... or do both!

2 things that are important in photography - (1) lighting, (2) composition... and I'll add the 3rd... post-processing. I know some purist may not like the post-processing part, but I find it important, sometimes just to tweak a little here and there, e.g. exposure, brightness, contrast, etc.

Master these 3 and you'll do great! ;)
 

Foxshade

New Member
Jun 26, 2009
849
3
0
46
In cat's stomach
#11
Hi hi... welcome.

I am also using D90, and so far I find D90 is an amazing camera... but, so is Canon, Pentax, Sony, etc... and I have concluded that it's the photographer that count most.

Your shot is not very sharp. Which part of the picture did you try to focus on?
Is the church lighting too dim that you were forced to use higher ISO and longer shutter speed?

D90 digital noise in high ISO shooting is bad. I always set it to 200 and never exceed 800.

you can also wrap the camera strap around your camera hand (right hand) tightly to stabilize your grip. Of course nothing beats a good tripod.

The dullness, maybe because of lack of contrasting colors, lack of proper composition?
This is the article I have been reading, and keep it under my pillow so I can refer to it before I sleep.

Lastly, read the manual. You'll need to know your camera intimately to exploit it's strength and cover it's weaknesses.
 

Last edited:

pokiemon

Senior Member
Mar 5, 2005
2,039
0
0
#12
what's dull abt your picture??

if you want it warmer, go to photoshop and use a warm filter.
 

eternalSun

New Member
Apr 15, 2010
66
0
0
35
#13
Is this better? I just did a bit of adjustment/editing of the pic.

Thanks! Nothing again post processing but was hoping to get the basics right before starting on post processing

Ahh! Church of the Divine Mercy
1) the lighting in the church is real bad
2)visible handshake although high iso is used.
seems like you've taken it before or after mass, or on a weekday.

*solution wait for mass to start,this is probably the only time where they will on the lights.
wait.. you'll also need to compensate your exposure, due to the large amounts of whites behind the dirty bronze crucifix.
Yes!! Church of Divine Mercy. Went there around 1+ so it was after mass i guess. no idea if it's more due to my hand being unsteady or there being too much whites. If there are too many white's I should meter off the bronze crucifix? Or should I up the exposure compensation? Sorry for asking noob question.

are you shooting on completely auto settings?
Nope. Was shooting using aperture priority. but i think i set my metering to 3d....should i have used center or spot metering?

Hi hi... welcome.

I am also using D90, and so far I find D90 is an amazing camera... but, so is Canon, Pentax, Sony, etc... and I have concluded that it's the photographer that count most.

Your shot is not very sharp. Which part of the picture did you try to focus on?
Is the church lighting too dim that you were forced to use higher ISO and longer shutter speed?

D90 digital noise in high ISO shooting is bad. I always set it to 200 and never exceed 800.

you can also wrap the camera strap around your camera hand (right hand) tightly to stabilize your grip. Of course nothing beats a good tripod.

The dullness, maybe because of lack of contrasting colors, lack of proper composition?
This is the article I have been reading, and keep it under my pillow so I can refer to it before I sleep.

Lastly, read the manual. You'll need to know your camera intimately to exploit it's strength and cover it's weaknesses.
The lighting was rather dim so i had to use iso 800... also I don't really like setting the iso beyond 800 thus the longer shutter speed. But i've shot a couple of photos else where at iso 800 as well and the results were better. Will read up on that article you posted. thanks!
 

Squid

New Member
Jun 10, 2004
1,467
0
0
#14
EXIF information of threat starter's image shows the following
-- Nikon D90 DSLR fitted with AF-S 18-105VR F3.5-5.6 lens
-- Aperture priority setting
-- 58mm focal length AF-C Dynamic Wide AF-Area mode with VR turned on
-- ISO800 1/13s shutter speed F5 setting (against max. aperture opening of F5.1) EV+0
-- Auto Active D-Lighting setting
-- High ISO noise reduction activated
-- Standard setting for picture control
-- Possibly auto white balance setting

At focal 58mm focal length, Photozone and SLRGear indicate better image can be obtained from F8 or F11 aperture setting.

If thread starter wishes to capture ambient light of the indoor environment, tripod mounted shot with low ISO setting, small aperture setting & slow shutter speed maybe an alternative setting to pursue instead of relying on pumping up the ISO setting.

In addition, picture lacked post processing as thread starter's picture histogram showed low contrast with pixels crowding left half of histogram distribution before processing. This possibly occurred as the camera is partially fooled by the light coloured wall. Other enhancements during post processing may include increasing lens distortion correction, colour cast correction, colour saturation and image sharpening.

Below is outcome my attempt on the post processing of thread starter image.

 

voxies09

New Member
Apr 11, 2010
651
0
0
Singapore
#15
i think using fast lens with wider aperture will be good in low light situation like in the church
 

eternalSun

New Member
Apr 15, 2010
66
0
0
35
#16
EXIF information of threat starter's image shows the following
-- Nikon D90 DSLR fitted with AF-S 18-105VR F3.5-5.6 lens
-- Aperture priority setting
-- 58mm focal length AF-C Dynamic Wide AF-Area mode with VR turned on
-- ISO800 1/13s shutter speed F5 setting (against max. aperture opening of F5.1) EV+0
-- Auto Active D-Lighting setting
-- High ISO noise reduction activated
-- Standard setting for picture control
-- Possibly auto white balance setting

At focal 58mm focal length, Photozone and SLRGear indicate better image can be obtained from F8 or F11 aperture setting.

If thread starter wishes to capture ambient light of the indoor environment, tripod mounted shot with low ISO setting, small aperture setting & slow shutter speed maybe an alternative setting to pursue instead of relying on pumping up the ISO setting.

In addition, picture lacked post processing as thread starter's picture histogram showed low contrast with pixels crowding left half of histogram distribution before processing. This possibly occurred as the camera is partially fooled by the light coloured wall. Other enhancements during post processing may include increasing lens distortion correction, colour cast correction, colour saturation and image sharpening.

Below is outcome my attempt on the post processing of thread starter image.

wow! that looks much nicer. I don't have a tripod currently. will be getting one sometime in the near future but not so soon cause realise i've been spending too much :bsmilie: I've not done any post processing. Will look into those post processing method you've mentioned. Thanks!
 

Oct 26, 2006
1,355
0
0
31
toa payoh
#17
Yes!! Church of Divine Mercy. Went there around 1+ so it was after mass i guess. no idea if it's more due to my hand being unsteady or there being too much whites. If there are too many white's I should meter off the bronze crucifix? Or should I up the exposure compensation? Sorry for asking noob question.
you can either meter the brown wall, or up your exp comp, its your preference.
for me, i'll use an external meter and get the ambient reading.
 

NeTHaCk

Senior Member
Dec 8, 2004
787
0
16
30
Tampines
#18
D90 digital noise in high ISO shooting is bad. I always set it to 200 and never exceed 800.
wow. if you think d90 ISO noise is bad, have you ever ever ever tried the d50/70 or d80 or d200?

iso1600 is still good compared to all those bodies. rule of thumb if your ISO max is 3200, never exceed 1600. if its Hi1 or 6400 never exceed 3200. always 1/2 way mark. never more

back to topic, Ts needs to have post processing, most probably your ISO setting set to auto iso and where's your point of focus ? one more trick to good balance is your shooting. if you've been in NS, during rifle range, they teach you to hold your breath then fire to get more accurate shots. same theory :)
 

eternalSun

New Member
Apr 15, 2010
66
0
0
35
#19
you can either meter the brown wall, or up your exp comp, its your preference.
for me, i'll use an external meter and get the ambient reading.
Sorry but what's external meter?

wow. if you think d90 ISO noise is bad, have you ever ever ever tried the d50/70 or d80 or d200?

iso1600 is still good compared to all those bodies. rule of thumb if your ISO max is 3200, never exceed 1600. if its Hi1 or 6400 never exceed 3200. always 1/2 way mark. never more

back to topic, Ts needs to have post processing, most probably your ISO setting set to auto iso and where's your point of focus ? one more trick to good balance is your shooting. if you've been in NS, during rifle range, they teach you to hold your breath then fire to get more accurate shots. same theory :)
hmm my point of focus was on the cross and i did manually set the iso. was it too high? if i set it any lower my shutter speed would have been longer and i've already maxed my apperture.....always never manage to get marksman in ns :embrass:
 

ovaltinemilo

Senior Member
Sep 12, 2009
2,819
0
0
Sin jia Po lah
#20
Sorry but what's external meter?

hmm my point of focus was on the cross and i did manually set the iso. was it too high? if i set it any lower my shutter speed would have been longer and i've already maxed my apperture.....always never manage to get marksman in ns :embrass:
you already have not enough light to start with...I would think, using your 18-105, try to shoot at 18mm, 1/6-1/10 with your VR on..don't use any in camera NR.

How to really improve your shot more in the future for this location? get a f1.8 lens;p
 

Top Bottom