Anti shake vs. good iso


Status
Not open for further replies.
Sep 3, 2003
1,678
0
0
49
Sengkang
Visit site
#1
Recently there are lots of comments on anti-shake features on cameras.. but if you have a good camera with very low noise on high ISO, such as Canon 300D, do you still need the anti-shake feature?
:think:
 

nickmak

Senior Member
Apr 16, 2004
2,358
0
0
31
London, UK
www.pbase.com
#2
Eyesthruthelens said:
Recently there are lots of comments on anti-shake features on cameras.. but if you have a good camera with very low noise on high ISO, such as Canon 300D, do you still need the anti-shake feature?
:think:
It depends what you want. They go hand in hand. IS, VR or AS cannot stop action so a high ISO will be needed. Of course if I know what I'm going to shoot and if it requires something like IS, VR, or AS, then I use my tripod, monopod, or bump the ISO by 1 stop. Should do the trick, considering nowadays the noise level at high ISO's are really good.
 

jsbn

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2002
2,944
0
0
Planet Eropagnis
#3
Low noise on High ISO? 300D? Erm.....

Not say I wanna condemn my own camera, but unless really forced to, I don't shoot anything beyond ISO400. ISO800 or 1600 and I have to start opening photoshop just to remove all those noise. :(

Maybe if u're talking abt full frame sensor cameras like the 1DsMkII or wad, higher ISOs might be cleaner. :)
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom