angel!


Status
Not open for further replies.

dingying

New Member
Apr 5, 2006
178
0
0
singapore
#1


comment please please =D
i know the bottom looks damn 2D haha sorry :embrass:
 

yuframes

New Member
Jun 8, 2006
202
0
0
#4
splendour shot! :thumbsup:

but the watermark of your name abit turn off.
like spolit the senerity of the photo
hahaha;p

just an opinion though
cheer~~!
 

Jun 13, 2006
116
0
0
#6
hmmm.. Angel lacks details. if it 's silou, then imho it is not contrasty..

Perhaps relooks at the composition again.
 

#7
Glare is quite distracting. If you position the sun right behind the wing you can still get the gradient in the sky, and can expose a little more of the statue also.

I love the idea and the feel to this! v nice!
 

dingying

New Member
Apr 5, 2006
178
0
0
singapore
#10
PointBlue said:
Glare is quite distracting. If you position the sun right behind the wing you can still get the gradient in the sky, and can expose a little more of the statue also.

I love the idea and the feel to this! v nice!
hahaha actually there wasn't any sun behind! i PS-ed the glare... :bsmilie:
thanks for commenting!

Crysania said:
Nice... would prefer the statue to be a bit lighter.. then can see more details.
Btw how do u create the watermark ar?
oooo.. watermark arr.. i used adobe CS2 arrr.. type the words in loh ;)

shchow said:
i love it.
thank you thank you!! :lovegrin:
 

Tower

New Member
Aug 30, 2006
16
0
0
AMK
#11
dingying said:
hahaha actually there wasn't any sun behind! i PS-ed the glare... :bsmilie:
thanks for commenting!
Woah.. Can't tell it's PS-ed.. :)
Cool. Maybe can add in a lens flare. :D
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom