advice on hardware for photoshop


Status
Not open for further replies.

happyfrog

New Member
Feb 4, 2009
594
0
0
#1
hi, i need some advice on hardware for photoshop.

is it better to get core 2 duo or quad core CPU? will quad core have a major improvement for photoshop?

what about graphics card? which series is good? radeon 4890 or GTX?

appreciate the help.
 

tainted

New Member
Feb 6, 2006
461
0
0
in Critterdom
#2
depends on which version of photoshop you would be using first.
I think core 2 duo should be enough.
depends on the ram and gfx card if I'm right.
So,
which version of photoshop are you gonna be installing?
 

happyfrog

New Member
Feb 4, 2009
594
0
0
#3
going to use CS4.

not sure if quad core will be utilized fully.

4GB RAM (normal) non-overclocked.

I'm thinking of using the HIS Radeon 4890 1GB.

not sure if it's overkill. dont wanna spend too much on it also.
 

Rashkae

Senior Member
Nov 28, 2005
19,105
12
0
#4
going to use CS4.

not sure if quad core will be utilized fully.

4GB RAM (normal) non-overclocked.

I'm thinking of using the HIS Radeon 4890 1GB.

not sure if it's overkill. dont wanna spend too much on it also.
Photoshop is not going to take advantage of the 4890 at all. But then again, you'll have a good gaming system too. ;)
 

happyfrog

New Member
Feb 4, 2009
594
0
0
#5
Photoshop is not going to take advantage of the 4890 at all. But then again, you'll have a good gaming system too. ;)
yes, for gaming too :) . but what i heard is graphics card do play a major role in overall improvement too. so, what will benefit photoshop the most? more RAM? i think windows XP can't benefit more than 3GB, vista, probably more.... still will not use more than 3GB.

anyone knows if Photoshop CS4 is written to utilize Quad Core? or only dual core? :dunno:
 

Octarine

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 3, 2008
12,477
25
48
Pasir Ris
#6
Photoshop can utilize only certain types of GPU, not all. And certainly it's not the major factor. Read more here: http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/404/kb404898.html
If you want to use 4GB RAM (or more) than the questions is not whether to use XP or Vista but rather 64bit instead of 32bit OS.
Since LR2 can utilize 4 cores my guess is that CS4 can to the same.
 

happyfrog

New Member
Feb 4, 2009
594
0
0
#7
Photoshop can utilize only certain types of GPU, not all. And certainly it's not the major factor. Read more here: http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/404/kb404898.html
If you want to use 4GB RAM (or more) than the questions is not whether to use XP or Vista but rather 64bit instead of 32bit OS.
Since LR2 can utilize 4 cores my guess is that CS4 can to the same.
thanks for the help. :)

guess will just get a 4 core then.

have any of you compare between a CS run on a 64 bit and 32 bit OS before?
 

kkleong

New Member
Jan 21, 2005
190
0
0
In The Wilderness
#9
For data, application and Photoshop - Quad CPU is definitely faster than Duo for the same CPU speed. Unless it's for gaming, Intel is better than AMD. Overall, i7 is currently the best :thumbsup:

Here is a benchmark from Anantech:
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3551&p=9

ATI 4890 should be more than sufficient for CS4 (even 4850 is okay)

List of tested graphic cards for CS4 in Win & Mac:
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/405/kb405711.html

As above posts had mentioned, 64-bit OS is able to run/optimize if memory >>4G ram.

Unless you do not have legacy hardware, drivers for 64-bit may have compatibility issues :think:
 

Last edited:

Octarine

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 3, 2008
12,477
25
48
Pasir Ris
#10
Feb 28, 2004
388
3
18
nns555.zenfolio.com
#12
thanks for the help. :)

guess will just get a 4 core then.

have any of you compare between a CS run on a 64 bit and 32 bit OS before?
Hi,

Last year I upgraded from a dual core PC w/4GB DRAM running 32-bit XP Pro to a quad core with 8GB RAM running on 64-bit Vista. The main advantage her is when you are post processing multiple files, especially those with multi-layers. The quad core w/64-bit Vista performs effortlessly, but the dual core with 4GB slows down. But the downside is many plug-ins are not available in 64-bit versions. I am using CS4.

N.S. Ng

http://nns555.zenfolio.com/
 

happyfrog

New Member
Feb 4, 2009
594
0
0
#13
Hi,

Last year I upgraded from a dual core PC w/4GB DRAM running 32-bit XP Pro to a quad core with 8GB RAM running on 64-bit Vista. The main advantage her is when you are post processing multiple files, especially those with multi-layers. The quad core w/64-bit Vista performs effortlessly, but the dual core with 4GB slows down. But the downside is many plug-ins are not available in 64-bit versions. I am using CS4.

N.S. Ng

http://nns555.zenfolio.com/
what about dual graphics card in Crossfire or SLI? Will it be a major boost? Also, may I know the speed of your Quad-core processors? I'm thinking of an E8400 only.
 

rueyloon

New Member
Jan 17, 2002
1,679
0
0
www.rueyloon.com
#14
you can check out these 2 websites

1) www.barefeats.com
2) www.macperformanceguide.com

they mac based tests but should give you enough insights into quad vs octo processors.

It seems that PS is still very much clock based and not very multiprocessor aware. The worst is when it is opening a file, it seems to be just single threaded. There is alot of technical info from those 2 websites, go check them out.

cheers
 

Xiao_shin

New Member
Sep 21, 2002
1,113
0
0
43
Visit site
#15
Thinking of changing from dual core to quad core too.

Using CS3 and NX2. Any improvements on the performance if I changed?
 

Feb 28, 2004
388
3
18
nns555.zenfolio.com
#16
what about dual graphics card in Crossfire or SLI? Will it be a major boost? Also, may I know the speed of your Quad-core processors? I'm thinking of an E8400 only.
Hi,

I am using an ATI 4850 card which is an overkill for CS3/CS4. The processor is Q9450 @2.66 GHz. I have overclocked this to3.55 GHz and it is still stable.

My tiff files after conversion from RAW is about 59MB and if I have several layers these could go up to 200+ MB per file! Depending on the files, I might carry out quite a bit of post processing.


N.S. Ng
http://nns555.zenfolio.com/
 

Del_CtrlnoAlt

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2003
16,268
0
0
Outside the Dry Box.
Visit site
#17
Thinking of changing from dual core to quad core too.

Using CS3 and NX2. Any improvements on the performance if I changed?
mod reading...

depends... if u change from a 3.2ghz duo core to 2.4ghz quad core... its a downgrade... lol...

anyway, like previously said, i7 is good. but only if you know how to maximize it.

i'm running my i7 with 4ghz clock, with ddr3 ram running at 1600mhz (original speed). its hell lot faster than previously, either in single threaded or multi threaded stuff.
 

Xiao_shin

New Member
Sep 21, 2002
1,113
0
0
43
Visit site
#18
mod reading...

depends... if u change from a 3.2ghz duo core to 2.4ghz quad core... its a downgrade... lol...

anyway, like previously said, i7 is good. but only if you know how to maximize it.

i'm running my i7 with 4ghz clock, with ddr3 ram running at 1600mhz (original speed). its hell lot faster than previously, either in single threaded or multi threaded stuff.
Thanks for the reply.

I have the opportunity to change my duo core to quad core. However, I have to keep the rest of the system.

Say, a 3.0ghz DC to 3.0 QC, for PS and NX2. Any major improvement?
 

Del_CtrlnoAlt

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2003
16,268
0
0
Outside the Dry Box.
Visit site
#19
Thanks for the reply.

I have the opportunity to change my duo core to quad core. However, I have to keep the rest of the system.

Say, a 3.0ghz DC to 3.0 QC, for PS and NX2. Any major improvement?
got, improvement in heat... you'll feel the system hotter.

but if running single threaded items, or even booting up, no diff.

if you are doing rendering, or programs that will confirm use all 4 cores, then it will be faster.

if you notice, even if you run basic stuff on Windows, its only using 1 core, no matter how many cores there are.
 

Xiao_shin

New Member
Sep 21, 2002
1,113
0
0
43
Visit site
#20
got, improvement in heat... you'll feel the system hotter.

but if running single threaded items, or even booting up, no diff.

if you are doing rendering, or programs that will confirm use all 4 cores, then it will be faster.

if you notice, even if you run basic stuff on Windows, its only using 1 core, no matter how many cores there are.
Got heat and electricity improvement.. I know. :)

Will be using CS3 (Perhaps CS4 later) and NX2. 2 core definately will help for my case as I listen to music on my PC while processing. But quad core.. hmm mmm..

Maybe will just upgraded to a faster dual core.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.