#1
#2
1. I would like feedback on the post-processing applied to this picture of a sunbird. I have posted two photos for comparison.
Photo #1 is with minimum post-processing (mainly levels and shadow/highlight adjustments).
Photo #2 is with lowered levels selectively applied to the pupil of the eye, Nik Color Efex "Sunlight" and "Vignette: Blur" filters, cloning away the end of a branch, and sharpening selectively applied to the sunbird.
2. The objective of the piece of work is to draw attention to the sunbird and highlighting the color variations in its plumage.
The processing on the eye aims to increase perceived sharpness since we tend to focus our attention on eyes.
The Nik filters and cloning aim to even out and hide what I deem to be unattractive backlighting on the leaves on the right half of the photo.
I hoped also to help draw the viewer's attention to the bird through sharpening the bird and blurring the rest of the photo.
As for increasing the yellows and color saturation, well, it is a SUNbird after all...
3. The photo was taken in the late afternoon with fairly strong sunlight. It was a new 300mm lens and I did not have a polarizer for it, else I would have used it. I was hiding behind some bushes waiting for the sunbird to fly to the flowers in front of me, while battling the bugs feeding on me.
4. This was my first attempt at extensive post-processing. I think that it did achieve some of my aims like making the sunbird stand out more from the surrounding and fixing the backlight concerns. However, it may have introduced distractions and may be on the borderline of being "over-processed" (neither a clear abstract work of art nor staying true to perceived reality).
#2
1. I would like feedback on the post-processing applied to this picture of a sunbird. I have posted two photos for comparison.
Photo #1 is with minimum post-processing (mainly levels and shadow/highlight adjustments).
Photo #2 is with lowered levels selectively applied to the pupil of the eye, Nik Color Efex "Sunlight" and "Vignette: Blur" filters, cloning away the end of a branch, and sharpening selectively applied to the sunbird.
2. The objective of the piece of work is to draw attention to the sunbird and highlighting the color variations in its plumage.
The processing on the eye aims to increase perceived sharpness since we tend to focus our attention on eyes.
The Nik filters and cloning aim to even out and hide what I deem to be unattractive backlighting on the leaves on the right half of the photo.
I hoped also to help draw the viewer's attention to the bird through sharpening the bird and blurring the rest of the photo.
As for increasing the yellows and color saturation, well, it is a SUNbird after all...
3. The photo was taken in the late afternoon with fairly strong sunlight. It was a new 300mm lens and I did not have a polarizer for it, else I would have used it. I was hiding behind some bushes waiting for the sunbird to fly to the flowers in front of me, while battling the bugs feeding on me.
4. This was my first attempt at extensive post-processing. I think that it did achieve some of my aims like making the sunbird stand out more from the surrounding and fixing the backlight concerns. However, it may have introduced distractions and may be on the borderline of being "over-processed" (neither a clear abstract work of art nor staying true to perceived reality).