V
vince123123
Guest
earlier i bought the 20-35, then found its not wide enough, so bought the 18-70. from then i found the 18-70 much more versatile, and never had a chance to use the 20-35.
the qn now is, have any of you guys found a wide 2.8 useful? i never had a chance to use 2.8 for a wide...can't find a reason why i'd need 2.8 for blurred background (if evn that can be used as wides are bad in blurring backgrounds).
the only use i can see is a low light situation, perhaps outdoor nightscapes or something.
anyone else can give me situations why i may want to use a 20-35 f2.8 rather than the 18-70 f3.5? thanks!
the qn now is, have any of you guys found a wide 2.8 useful? i never had a chance to use 2.8 for a wide...can't find a reason why i'd need 2.8 for blurred background (if evn that can be used as wides are bad in blurring backgrounds).
the only use i can see is a low light situation, perhaps outdoor nightscapes or something.
anyone else can give me situations why i may want to use a 20-35 f2.8 rather than the 18-70 f3.5? thanks!