1st dslr - Nikon d60 or d5000?


Status
Not open for further replies.

janech18

New Member
May 11, 2009
4
0
0
#1
Hi! which would u all recommend? I am a newbie and want something which i can pick up... went to audio house to look at both... i like d60 for it is lighter, but doesnt have live view.. and the uncle tell me the video in d5000 sucks...
I juz wanna take up as a hobby.. which would u recommend?? or i am open to other brands too.. any recommendation?
d5000 cost 1,299.. so i think tats the max budget i have.... and visiting such shops as i would like to get the cam via installment...
Pls advise! Thanks!!
 

DrSpock

New Member
Mar 12, 2009
1,088
0
0
Warp back to Simei
#2
IMHO, get D60 will do you good and use balance budget to get a good 2nd hand lense, like 50f1.8(manual F on D60) or 18mm to 105mm kit lens, to expand your arsenal.

If you use liveview on DSLR might as well stick to PnS. I'm using a D90 but will NEVER:nono: use the video mode. Oh one more thing, once you do get a DSLR, blanko the Auto mode and start using PASM mode ok.:devil:
 

HHenrYY

New Member
Mar 18, 2009
235
0
0
Singapore
#3
also imho , i would get D60 if i were you.

just like what drspock says . if use liveview might as well use pns .
but i muz say liveview is essential sometimes, especially for newbies like me, can use liveview to get the prespectives right.
 

Fotophilic

Senior Member
Jun 18, 2006
2,388
0
36
big tree town
#4
forget about the video mode unless u are very desperate.

D5000 is more or less a D90 trapped in a smaller body. Better noise handling, more functions.

But if u don't need them, just get D60, which i think is already pretty good.
 

Sep 28, 2008
896
0
0
33
#6
i vouch for D5000.

was a user of D80 (shares same sensor as D60) and now a current user of D90(same sensor as D5000)
the iso capability of D90 is 2-3 times better than d80 meaning D5000 iso is 2-3 times better than d60.

Meaning you can shoot at lower light with faster speed and less noise. That matters alot to me and that is well worth the extra 400 bucks.
yes video quality sucks compared to HD video recorder. try videoing with a 35mm f1.8 with manual focus and manual aperature change...it really feels gd, after some video editing you can cre8 quality video with d5000/d90

d60 is only 1 year old...but its sensor is 2-3 years old.
d90/d5000 is less than a few mths old....

see some pics of d80 at iso1600 and d90 at 1600
or d60 at iso 1600 and d5000 @ iso1600 you would know which to buy
 

janech18

New Member
May 11, 2009
4
0
0
#7
thanks guys....
at audio hse... d5k is only $100 more exp than d60.....
so i was thinkin of d5k more initially....
 

ortega

Moderator
Staff member
Nov 2, 2004
23,694
10
38
Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
#8
get the D5000, it is 2nd generation camera technology
the guy is trying to clear his old stocks

always buy new technology
 

jlkk76

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2006
2,148
0
0
Tampines
#9
get the D5000, it is 2nd generation camera technology
the guy is trying to clear his old stocks

always buy new technology
agreed...:thumbsup:

rem to BBB! :devil:
 

Lomographer

Senior Member
Apr 27, 2009
2,047
0
0
Paterson Road
#11
its the BBB (BUY BUY BUY) virus

i think you're gonna be infected soon

there is no world buying organisation to stop you from buying here

haha hope to see you with more glass
 

Lomographer

Senior Member
Apr 27, 2009
2,047
0
0
Paterson Road
#12
to TS: you can settle for the D60

as the only difference is that the D5000 as compared has a larger screen of 0.2 inches

and has movie mode

if you're in need of the movie mode, then the D5000 should b your choice

if not, get the D60 or even the D40 if you can find some clearance pieces
 

Sep 28, 2008
896
0
0
33
#13
to TS: you can settle for the D60

as the only difference is that the D5000 as compared has a larger screen of 0.2 inches

and has movie mode

if you're in need of the movie mode, then the D5000 should b your choice

if not, get the D60 or even the D40 if you can find some clearance pieces


you have forgotten abt iso sensitivity. the only reason i upgraded from d80 to d90 and why people should get d5000 instead of d60.

d5000 comes with a whole lot of other functions too.

noise test
http://esuastegui.esmartweb.com/D80/tech/d90d80ns/index.html
its comparing d80 to d90. but since d60 sensor is same as d80 and s5000 same as d90. you can expect similiar results


d80 iso1600




d90 iso 1600
 

Last edited:
#14
Hmmm.... wildsoyabean

seem to be very particular about noise... Maybe with such advances in DSLR sensors... Noise will soon be an unacceptable feature future pictures. Very soon VR will be so good, people will be penalized for producing shaky-blur pictures! :bsmilie:

Anyways, Noisy pictures are still better than blur ones. Noise can add a level of interest and grainy feel when the picture is in b/w. Noise can give an authentic look to colors. I wonder why noise filters exist in CS4??

Afraid of noise... use a faster wider lens lor. Use flash lor...Look for a better light source lor. Use Tripod Lor. Use Noise Ninja lor. Wear ear plugs lor... :bsmilie:... My D80 quite good with 17~35 f/2.8.

I read that a couple of years back, a group of Nat Geo photographers are told to surrender their Leicas and D2s... and exchange it for a D70s. 1 month later. All still comes back with stunning pictures. - Outdoor Photographer Magazine.

Welcome to the DSLR forum. There is never a perfect camera. Look like TS has a camera in mind. Happy creating pictures.

Cheers! :-}
 

Lomographer

Senior Member
Apr 27, 2009
2,047
0
0
Paterson Road
#15
oops forgot about iso sensitivity

i do not bother as i usually use up to ISO 400 which is no problem for any camera

as i still shoot film alot, we dont shoot iso 3200 film and mainly shoot 50,100,200 and 400

hence it's why i dont exactly bother about whats the iso usable for the cam cos i know i wont need anything above 400
 

May 11, 2009
215
0
0
#16
its the BBB (BUY BUY BUY) virus

i think you're gonna be infected soon

there is no world buying organisation to stop you from buying here

haha hope to see you with more glass

Thanks Lomo, yeah this is contageous! Hopefully TS posts what she ends up getting.
 

Sep 28, 2008
896
0
0
33
#18
Hmmm.... wildsoyabean

seem to be very particular about noise... Maybe with such advances in DSLR sensors... Noise will soon be an unacceptable feature future pictures. Very soon VR will be so good, people will be penalized for producing shaky-blur pictures! :bsmilie:

Anyways, Noisy pictures are still better than blur ones. Noise can add a level of interest and grainy feel when the picture is in b/w. Noise can give an authentic look to colors. I wonder why noise filters exist in CS4??

Afraid of noise... use a faster wider lens lor. Use flash lor...Look for a better light source lor. Use Tripod Lor. Use Noise Ninja lor. Wear ear plugs lor... :bsmilie:... My D80 quite good with 17~35 f/2.8.

I read that a couple of years back, a group of Nat Geo photographers are told to surrender their Leicas and D2s... and exchange it for a D70s. 1 month later. All still comes back with stunning pictures. - Outdoor Photographer Magazine.

Welcome to the DSLR forum. There is never a perfect camera. Look like TS has a camera in mind. Happy creating pictures.

Cheers! :-}

its easier to add noise then remove noise.
for a mere 100 dollars for lower noise results? of course get a better camera
a VR usually increase the price of the camera by more than $100
lower fstop are usually not available for beginners.
that said the little bit of price increase is well worth the money to get a better sensor.
2-3 years in alot of years in this technological age.
noisy picture is better than blur picture.
clear no noise picture is better than noisy clear picture
 

MelbourneGuy

Deregistered
Jan 19, 2009
169
0
0
#19
To TS, you are probably now starting to notice that whenever you ask a question like this you will get just as many people telling you to buy 'Option A' as you will telling you to buy 'Option B'.

My advice would be to listen to why people are telling you to make a certain choice, instead of what that choice actually is. See if the reasons make sense to you and suit your wants and needs.

Personally, my view is that consumer electronics are a rapidly improving technology, and their price falls quite quickly. Going for the D5000 would give you a current camera rather than an aging one, and you might get more back when you try to sell it later if you decide to upgrade. However I do agree with an earlier statement saying that the video feature is more of a gimmick...let's face it, if you want good video you'd buy a camcorder. Video in DSLRs is a very new and immature technology and has many shortcomings. But as with all major purchases, be sure to do your research before you buy! :)
 

Last edited:

Reportage

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2008
5,785
2
0
#20
i recommend a second hand D200 or D300 if you are more into events shooting. Otherwise save up further for the D90.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom