Maybe you shld try using the MKII?tomshen said:Has anyone used 1D for fireworks? I know 1D is not great for long time exposure. but even exposed at 1~4 seconds, the noise-level is not acceptable, actually very bad. D60/10D is much more superior in this aspect. :dunno:
ST1100 said:Maybe it's a CCD/CMOS thing? Just guessing here. 1D doesn't have dark frame subtraction option?
tomshen said:Has anyone used 1D for fireworks? I know 1D is not great for long time exposure. but even exposed at 1~4 seconds, the noise-level is not acceptable, actually very bad. D60/10D is much more superior in this aspect. :dunno:
Wai said:On the other hand, my pal next to me was complaining that his D60 buffer full half way and his 1.6x FLM not wide enough to cover everything
Jed said:No, the 1D isn't very good for fireworks, as already pointed out a 10D or D60 will have lower long exposure noise. Furthermore, a 10D or D60 will also have increased resolution over the 1D. In fact, the 10D or D60 represents a far better camera for most amateurs as the real strength of the 1D lies in capturing sport and other fast paced action, and otherwise it is a very ordinary camera. Unfortunately plenty of CSers seem to lust after one for some unknown reason.
tomshen said:Has anyone used 1D for fireworks? I know 1D is not great for long time exposure. but even exposed at 1~4 seconds, the noise-level is not acceptable, actually very bad. D60/10D is much more superior in this aspect. :dunno:
tomshen said:hah, didn't follow this thead. So many replies, thanks
Guess I have to swallow it.
Don't get me wrongly. I am actually extremely satisfied with 1D, just like how I loved my D60 last time. Camera is only a tool, and I wish to maximize its value. 1D is every bit made for me, coz I shoot moving subjects (not necessarily sports etc) all the time. MK2 is out of my budget :dunno:Belle&Sebastain said:you could sell off too?