18-55mm non vr - 18-55mm VR


Status
Not open for further replies.

an an

New Member
May 31, 2009
55
0
0
#1
i wanna check from you guys.. whats the different between these two? i know its vr and non VR..but whats the different in the picture quality? is there any? any idea?
 

SVG84R

New Member
Dec 19, 2008
303
0
0
#2
picture quality is the same...for such a short focal range...you can go for the one without vr cos its really cheap
 

daniel0ng

New Member
Jul 23, 2008
521
0
0
Upper Bukit Timah
#3
I used both before (assuming you're referring to Nikkor) and didn't perceive any difference in quality.

The VR came in useful though, but it'll depend on you whether it's worth the extra $70 in the B&S section.
 

an an

New Member
May 31, 2009
55
0
0
#5
but there is no need for VR when using tripod at night rite? but night photography u need a tripod am i right? :thumbsup:
 

Dec 10, 2008
1,732
0
0
26
Pasir Ris
#6
low light doesnt mean night. you want to use tripod in event halls meh?

VR is always good to have. No point saving the 70 if it only gets you blur shots
 

Last edited:

castarito

New Member
Dec 23, 2008
95
0
0
#7
ahhh icic haha u got the point there haha okok best thnx for the advice!
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom