18-55mm, 55-200mm, 18-105mm


Status
Not open for further replies.

LBL2009

New Member
Jul 9, 2009
478
0
0
Seletar Estate, Singapore
#1
When I shoot with my D40 with the 18-55mm kit lens, I wish I have a 55-200mm with me. After I bought a 55-200mm and go out shooting with it, I wish I have the 18-55mm with me.

Of course, I can always bring two lenses with me and change lens on the spot but I hate to do it.

Now, I feel maybe I should get a 18-105mm kit lens instead.

I know D90 comes with 18-105mm lens and it must be a perfect combination.

How about people who use a D40 with 18-105mm, what's your experience like?

I am not going for 18-200mm, it is too expensive for me.
 

Last edited:
Jul 13, 2009
446
0
16
#2
Haha. Buy buy buy virus.
Hmm, for me, I also will think like that often.
But you gotta train your shooting, i think?
Like stick to a lens and use it to compose.
Go near, step back?
haha. enjoy! :D
 

Sep 6, 2009
98
0
0
West of Singapore
#3
I just got my D3000 last month, instead of settling with a kit lens, i trade-in the 18-55mm at alan and topped up another 340 for an 18-105mm which is the kit lens for D90. I feel that it suffice for most of my shooting needs except in occasions whereby I try to shoot animals (e.g. stray cats) and I cannot get too close to them.
 

Last edited:

Rashkae

Senior Member
Nov 28, 2005
19,105
12
0
#4
Either get a 18-200, or bring both lenses.
 

LBL2009

New Member
Jul 9, 2009
478
0
0
Seletar Estate, Singapore
#5
I just got my D3000 last month, instead of settling with a kit lens, i trade-in the 18-55mm at alan and topped up another 340 for an 18-105mm which is the kit lens for D90. I feel that it suffice for most of my shooting needs except in occasions whereby I try to shoot animals (e.g. stray cats) and I cannot get too close to them.
You made the right decision. Not sure whether $340 is too much though but it doesn't matter, a right decision is more important. :)

I would be happy to have a 18-105mm on my D40.
 

Last edited:

ZerocoolAstra

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2008
9,522
0
0
rainy Singapore
#6
You made the right decision. Not sure whether $340 is too much though but it doesn't matter, a right decision is more important. :)

I would be happy to have a 18-105mm on my D40.
do you sums, and if you think replacing the 18-55 (and 55-200?) with the 18-105 is within your means, by all means BBB :devil:
 

May 11, 2009
55
0
0
#7
If u think 18-200 is too expensive for u. Why not just stick with the combo u have? Just change lens if thers's a need to.

If u find it troublesome, i guess u'll have to save up and get the 18-200 then try to sell off the kit lens and 55-200mm
 

SevenZ

New Member
Mar 18, 2009
19
0
0
#8
Been using d40 with 18-105 for a long time!
never regretted it! awesome lens.
 

baggiolee

Senior Member
Dec 7, 2006
1,748
0
36
www.facebook.com
#9
If u think 18-200 is too expensive for u. Why not just stick with the combo u have? Just change lens if thers's a need to.

If u find it troublesome, i guess u'll have to save up and get the 18-200 then try to sell off the kit lens and 55-200mm
same idea.
 

ZerocoolAstra

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2008
9,522
0
0
rainy Singapore
#10
Been using d40 with 18-105 for a long time!
never regretted it! awesome lens.
I don't often shoot at longer than 100mm, so to me, the 18-105 is the ideal focal range for a walkabout lens. 18-200 is more expense (and weight) for no benefit.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom