Recent content by XkaOnslaught

135 photos... lazy to post one by one, so ill just give link to the set haha.. http://www.flickr.com/photos/xkaonslaught/sets/72157624288875475/

posting up a couple before i head back down today. 1. 2.

yep. its excellent lens.

technically its not even a EVIL. there is no electronic viewfinder to talk about.

If you SERIOUSLY want to shoot VIDEO, get a CAMCORDER.

nikon's eyepiece mag for the d90 will also work on alpha dslrs minus the a850/900.

not the best, but the sharpest.

those i know that comfirm have for trying is wisma,paragon,and orchard central. a.k.a orchard lol

here are some photos, taken using A850, landscape cstyle, fine jpegs. default settings and no pp/sharpening done. all taken at f2.8 at mostly 24mm. sun is quite harsh today lol. 1. 2. 3. 4. 4. taken at 70mm

hmm a 82mm B+W MRC UV costs 120 bucks, its not as expensive as some might think lol. although i might try the hoya HD instead, i like to test new stuffs haha.

well one thing i noticed about the new sigma lenses, including the 50mm f1.4, is that its sharp out of the box, no calibration needed. i dunno why the canon camp always have problems with sigma lens but us sony doesnt.

i got mine from Cathay Photo, they should still have one more in stock. usually id just order from them, but i guess im lucky yesterday xD ill try to get some photos out soon

i just got the HSM one a few hours ago. i never used the older version before, but having used the CZ version a few times, i can say, the sigma can give the CZ a good run for its money. its definitely not as contrasty and sharp as the CZ, but its definitely a winner. for 1.4k this lens is really...

as far as i am concered it is excellent for the price. the same could be said for the VC one. so up to you bah xD

yep, but image quality for the old and new VC one is different, so do check if you would want to pay more for the newer one for its image quality.