Help all
- Thread starter guirongchoo
- Start date
Because it makes the camera handlers look good. And they can see a full picture.
Because ego can be bigger?
Why go full frame when u can go bigger then full frame ?
you're wrong, we all need 60MP medium format, not FF
http://www.hasselblad.com/medium-format/h5d-60
http://www.hasselblad.com/medium-format/h5d-60
Full frame is needed for the permanent "size matters" discussion. Usually the guys with the smaller ones make some noise about it.
Mainly depth of field (lack of it) of you ask me. Do a good read up on it.
That said going FF is just more of a personal preference rather than need for most of the users nowadays.
I've started with 1 inch sensors , moved to MFT and FF sensors and now settled with APSC and I don find myself at any disadvantage.
That said going FF is just more of a personal preference rather than need for most of the users nowadays.
I've started with 1 inch sensors , moved to MFT and FF sensors and now settled with APSC and I don find myself at any disadvantage.
For me it is because that is how my mind is wired for relevant focal lengths considering whatever I am trying to shoot at any given time. Crop factors tend to bug me nowadays. I messed with a lot of film before I had a digital camera so I learned appropriate focal lengths for various situations that way.
Last edited:
so are you saying you can't tell the differences between these two cameras from the images?
The seniors did say you do not need full frame to do studio shoots in your prior thread.
I would like to add a thought to this...this is another huge misconception perpetuated on the net imo. No one format is inherently better than any other. It is more about form, function, and application. Brand A is better than brand B is another thing like this.
Similar threads
