Police case you think?
[youtube]47PO6AQ0rIk[/youtube]
Make both drivers to pedestrians. Some years walking will cool them off.
Please, cut some slack for your police and investigation teams. Even without the video they can reconstruct what has happened, just from the position of the debris. If the debris is on the middle lane, then it's quite unlikely that the red car caused the crash, right? This video hopefully serves both to get their punishments.We don't know what went on between the 2 drivers earlier but it is stupid and unnecessary.
The bugger in black car knows what he is doing. Imagine if this video has not been captured. He could jolly well insist the red car crash into him. Can he be charged with attempted murder?
I didn't know road rage can be this bad. Not a bad way to get a new bumper and a fresh coat of paint. Except that this video would definitely be against him.
Please, cut some slack for your police and investigation teams. Even without the video they can reconstruct what has happened, just from the position of the debris. If the debris is on the middle lane, then it's quite unlikely that the red car caused the crash, right? This video hopefully serves both to get their punishments.
Why this hasty call for attempted murder investigations? Keen to see someone hanging? Would that help anybody?
From my layman perspective, I would think the black car can always say he change lane and the red car sped up and hit his rear right. Without video, it is your words against mine. The police will record the position of car and debris. If no one is injured, then insurance company will send their adjuster to look through reports. I have been told that adjuster will only use video evidence and witnesses if there is one. Photos of final resting places may or may not be used. Then it is just via the observation of the physical damages and the interpretation of report. So the video evidence is definitely crucial. The action of the black car can indeed kill somebody. I don't see why we need to tolerate such road rage?
The mere technical possibility of killing someone is different from the intention to kill or the deliberate tolerance / acceptance of someone's death. Be careful what you do, there are many things that can possibly kill other people :bsmilie:The action of the black car can indeed kill somebody. I don't see why we need to tolerate such road rage?
The mere technical possibility of killing someone is different from the intention to kill or the deliberate tolerance / acceptance of someone's death. Be careful what you do, there are many things that can possibly kill other people :bsmilie:
These 'some people' are lawyers, prosecution and (if sufficiently proven) the judge. You might want to consider that your laymen understanding is rather fear-mongering and unlimited 'what if' whining. It would be easy to construct a killing intention from a simple mishap that happens to you. Would you like that?Maybe to some people, staging a car accident is merely a technical possibility of killing someone.
These 'some people' are lawyers, prosecution and (if sufficiently proven) the judge. You might want to consider that your laymen understanding is rather fear-mongering and unlimited 'what if' whining. It would be easy to construct a killing intention from a simple mishap that happens to you. Would you like that?
So please refrain from allegations, assumptions and whatnot. All what we have here are some seconds of video footage.
No, obviously you fail to understand how the law works.I don't understand you. You need a lawyer to tell you this act captured in the video is dangerous and life threatening? As far as I an see, this is not a "simple mishap" but a deliberate act to cause an accident.
Anyway, I have no intention to be drawn into a debate, layman or not. I will end here.
No, obviously you fail to understand how the law works.
Different country, different legal system (just in case you missed that point).Ya, it is more like this:
http://m.nydailynews.com/1.1544508#bmb=1